Literature DB >> 17009828

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cages and local bone graft in the treatment of spinal stenosis.

Hans Trouillier1, Christof Birkenmaier, Alexander Rauch, Christoph Weiler, Thomas Kauschke, Hans Jürgen Refior.   

Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) implants are increasingly being used for 360 degrees fusion after decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative instability. Both titanium and PEEK (PolyEtherEtherKetone) implants are commonly used. Assessing the clinical and radiological results as well as typical complications, such as migration of the cages, is important. In addition, questions such as which radiological parameters can be used to assess successful fusion, and whether the exclusive use of local bone graft is sufficient, are frequently debated. We prospectively evaluated 30 patients after PLIF instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis, over a course of 42 months. In all cases, titanium cages and local bone graft were used for spondylodesis. The follow-up protocol of these 30 cases included standardised clinical and radiological evaluation at 3, 6, 12 and 42 months after surgery. Overall satisfactory results were achieved. With one exception, a stable result was achieved with restoration of the intervertebral space in the anterior column. After 42 months of follow-up in most cases, a radiologically visible loss of disc space height can be demonstrated. Clinically relevant migration of the cage in the dorsal direction was detected in one case. Based on our experience, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) can be recommended for the treatment of monosegmental and bisegmental spinal stenosis, with or without segmental instability. Postoperative evaluation is mainly based on clinical parameters since the titanium implant affects the diagnostic value of imaging studies and is responsible for artefacts. The results observed in our group of patients suggest that local autologous bone graft procured from the posterior elements after decompression is an adequate material for bone grafting in this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Wen Xiao; Hua Jiang; Li-Jing Yang; Zeng-Ming Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Trabecular metal spacers as standalone or with pedicle screw augmentation, in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erik Van de Kelft; Johan Van Goethem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine : a three-year follow-up of 37 patients.

Authors:  Bong Ju Moon; Bo Young Cho; Eun Young Choi; Ho Yeol Zhang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

4.  Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niek Koenders; Alison Rushton; Martin L Verra; Paul C Willems; Thomas J Hoogeboom; J Bart Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Graft vs. Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Graft or Cage: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Si-Dong Yang; Qian Chen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Jian-Qiang Zhao; Ying-Ze Zhang; Yong Shen; Da-Long Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-18

6.  Intraoperative Myelography in Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Preliminary Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Liangming Zhang; Jianwen Dong; Zihao Chen; Peigen Xie; Ruiqiang Chen; Lei He; Feng Feng; Limin Rong; Bin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Preliminary Results on Radiological Hypermobility at Upper Adjacent Disc Level in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared to Advanced Dynamic Stabilization.

Authors:  Tatsuya Ohtonari; Takehiro Kitagawa; Taisei Ota; Nobuharu Nishihara
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  ACDF with a PEEK cage clinically provides a good outcome with minor donor site morbidity despite unsatisfactory radiological findings-A prospective cohort study of a PEEK cage in stand-alone usage.

Authors:  Koichiro Okuyama; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Hiroshi Sasaki; Tadato Kido; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

9.  Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gottfried Buchhorn; Gabert Heidrich
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Dynamic stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal instability.

Authors:  Tatsuya Ohtonari; Nobuharu Nishihara; Katsuyasu Suwa; Taisei Ota; Tsunemaro Koyama
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.