Literature DB >> 17004613

Sex and the total knee: gender-sensitive designs.

Robert E Booth1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17004613     DOI： 10.3928/01477447-20060901-24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN： 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Sex-related outcome differences after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Norbert Kastner; Gerald Gruber; Birgit A Aigner; Jörg Friesenbichler; Michael Pechmann; Florentine Fürst; Patrick Vavken; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald; Kory D Charron; Robert B Bourne; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Gender-specific outcome after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Norbert Kastner; Birgit A Aigner; Tobias Meikl; Jörg Friesenbichler; Matthias Wolf; Mathias Glehr; Gerald Gruber; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Gender and condylar differences in distal femur morphometry clarified by automated computer analyses.

Authors:  Kang Li; Evan Langdale; Scott Tashman; Christopher Harner; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  No difference in gender-specific hip replacement outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy Kostamo; Robert B Bourne; John Paul Whittaker; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Roger H Emerson; Jessica Martinez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Preoperative morphometric differences in the distal femur are based on skeletal size in Japanese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Masataka Nishikawa; Hajime Owaki; Shoichi Kaneshiro; Takeshi Fuji
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Jeff G Jasko; Beverly S Thomas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Erin L Ruh; Jiajing Chen; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Javad Parvizi; Craig J Della Valle; William G Hamilton; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Can We Use the Posterior Condylar Off set as a Predictive Factor for Overhang of the Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Yoon-Seok Youm; Sung-Do Cho; Jin Eo; Ki-Bong Park; Sun-Ho Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2011-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.