Literature DB >> 18719975

Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women.

Jess H Lonner1, Jeff G Jasko, Beverly S Thomas.   

Abstract

There is debate about whether distinct designs of femoral components for men and women are needed based on morphologic and size differences between genders. We asked whether anthropomorphic differences exist between the distal femoral dimensions in women and men. We measured the distal femora of 100 women and 100 men intraoperatively after preparation for prosthetic implantation. The measured dimensions included the anteroposterior height from the posterior edge of the medial femoral condyle to the flush anterior cut, the mediolateral width at the transepicondylar axis, the anterior and posterior edges of the anterior chamfer, and the medial and lateral trochlear flanges. These measurements were compared between genders using independent-samples t test. The aspect ratio (a measure of the shape of the distal femur), the ratio between the anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions, was calculated for men and women to determine whether there is a shape difference between genders. The mean aspect ratio was larger for women than for men (0.84 [range, 0.57-1.03] versus 0.81 [range, 0.066-1.34], respectively). The standard deviation and range of each measurement of size and morphology suggest variability not only between genders but also within genders. Whether the aspect ratios and variations will reflect clinically important differences in outcomes after TKA with available prostheses will require additional study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18719975      PMCID: PMC2565021          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0415-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population.

Authors:  S V Vaidya; C S Ranawat; A Aroojis; N S Laud
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin C Bengs; Richard D Scott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald; Kory D Charron; Robert B Bourne; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur.

Authors:  C A King; M Y Işcan; S R Loth
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites.

Authors:  M Steyn; M Y Işcan
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1997-11-10       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; David F Dalury; David Zurakowski; Richard D Scott
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David A Fisher; Brian Dierckman; Melanie R Watts; Kenneth Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems.

Authors:  Kirby Hitt; John R Shurman; Kenneth Greene; Joseph McCarthy; Joseph Moskal; Tim Hoeman; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The impact of gender, age, and preoperative pain severity on pain after TKA.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Sherine Gabriel; David Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data.

Authors:  Carol J DeFrances; Karen A Cullen; Lola Jean Kozak
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  2007-12
View more
  35 in total

1.  Gender differences in the knees of Chinese population.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Songtao Ai; Tingting Tang; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Use of anthropometric data from the medial tibial and femoral condyles to design unicondylar knee prostheses in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Fu Bo Cheng; Xiao Feng Ji; Wen Xu Zheng; Ying Lai; Kai Liang Cheng; Jia Chun Feng; You Qiong Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anthropometric measurements of the knee: time to make it fit.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Gender difference of the femoral kinematics axis location and its relation to anterior cruciate ligament injury: a 3D-CT study.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Joon Ho Wang; Stephan Lorenz; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Difference in coronal curvature of the medial and lateral femoral condyle morphology by gender in implant design for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Ji-Hoon Nam; Hyun-Seok Chung; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Songtao Ai; Tingting Tang; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee.

Authors:  Pramod B Voleti; Jason W Stephenson; Paul A Lotke; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Patellar tendon orientation and patellar tracking in male and female knees.

Authors:  Kartik M Varadarajan; Thomas J Gill; Andrew A Freiberg; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Gender differences in the morphology of the trochlea and the distal femur.

Authors:  V Pinskerova; K Nemec; I Landor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Femoral sizing in total knee arthroplasty is rotation dependant.

Authors:  Angelique Koninckx; Arnaud Deltour; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.