Literature DB >> 25160474

Preoperative morphometric differences in the distal femur are based on skeletal size in Japanese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Masataka Nishikawa1, Hajime Owaki, Shoichi Kaneshiro, Takeshi Fuji.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to measure the morphometric parameters of preoperative distal femurs to determine the differences by diagnosis and gender after accounting for skeletal size.
METHODS: One-hundred and seventy-nine Japanese patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (25 males and 154 females) were assessed. The anteroposterior length (AP), mediolateral width (ML), aspect ratio (AR), surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) to posterior condylar axis (PCA) angle, and Whiteside to SEA angle were measured on preoperative computed tomography scans. The AP/ML, AR/ML, SEA/PCA, and Whiteside/PCA relationships were evaluated and compared by patient diagnosis and gender. The results were also compared with the sizes of 10 currently available TKA implants in Japan.
RESULTS: The mean AP, ML, AR, SEA/PCA angle, and Whiteside/PCA angle were 58.8 mm, 64.7 mm, 0.91, external rotation (ER) 3.5°, and ER 1.6°, respectively. AP and AR each were significantly correlated with ML (p < 0.001). AP, ML, and AR were not significantly different between patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. AP/ML and AR/ML were significantly correlated within each diagnosis (p < 0.001), but the analysis of covariance showed no significant differences between the diagnoses. AP and ML were significantly longer (p < 0.001) in males (63.6, 72.7 mm) than in females (58.1, 63.4 mm), while AR was smaller in males (0.88 vs. 0.92), with significant correlations for AP/ML (male: p < 0.010, female: p < 0.001) and AR/ML (male: p = 0.002, female: p < 0.001) in each gender. However, the analysis of covariance showed no significant differences between gender in the AP/ML and AR/MR correlations. The AP/ML ratio of our data was similar to the size variations of the 10 TKA implants, but the AR/ML ratio was quite different from almost all the implants.
CONCLUSIONS: No differences in preoperative femur morphometry were found between patients with different diagnoses, but the gender difference in AR was related to the difference in skeletal size between males and females. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series with no comparison groups, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25160474     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3253-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  33 in total

1.  The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. Four-to-nine-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M Akagi; T Nakamura; Y Matsusue; T Ueo; K Nishijyo; E Ohnishi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population.

Authors:  S V Vaidya; C S Ranawat; A Aroojis; N S Laud
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A study of Chinese knee joint geometry for prosthesis design.

Authors:  S W Wang; C H Feng; H S Lu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur.

Authors:  M R Mahfouz; B C Merkl; E E Abdel Fatah; R Booth; J N Argenson
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Gender differences in the anatomy of the distal femur.

Authors:  R J Gillespie; A Levine; S J Fitzgerald; J Kolaczko; M DeMaio; R E Marcus; D R Cooperman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

7.  Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  N Yoshino; S Takai; Y Ohtsuki; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Songtao Ai; Tingting Tang; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Analysis of the kinematics of total knee prostheses with a medial pivot design.

Authors:  Yoshiyasu Miyazaki; Takashi Nakamura; Katsunori Kogame; Muneki Saito; Keitaro Yamamoto; Toru Suguro
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Jeff G Jasko; Beverly S Thomas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sexual dimorphism and racial diversity render bone-implant mismatch inevitable after off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Beckers; Jacobus H Müller; Jeremy Daxhelet; Mo Saffarini; Tarik Aït-Si-Selmi; Michel P Bonnin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  What Differences in Morphologic Features of the Knee Exist Among Patients of Various Races? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  T K Kim; Mark Phillips; Mohit Bhandari; John Watson; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Morphology of a Kinematically Aligned Distal Femoral Osteotomy Is Different from That Obtained with Mechanical Alignment and Could Have Implications for the Design of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Quan-Hu Shen; Ji-Woong Baik; Ye-Yeon Won
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.