Literature DB >> 17002585

Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 is a negative regulator of peak BMD in SAMP6 mice.

Rika Nakanishi1, Motoyuki Shimizu, Masayuki Mori, Haruhiko Akiyama, Shuzo Okudaira, Bungo Otsuki, Maiko Hashimoto, Keiichi Higuchi, Masanori Hosokawa, Tadao Tsuboyama, Takashi Nakamura.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We segregated a QTL for peak BMD on Chr 13 by generating congenic sublines of the senescence-accelerated mouse SAMP6. Sfrp 4 within this locus was responsible for lower BMD of SAMP6.
INTRODUCTION: Our genome-wide linkage study using SAMP6 and SAMP2 showed a significant quantitative trait locus (QTL) for peak BMD on chromosome (Chr) 13. To verify the gene that regulates peak BMD, we generated a congenic strain, P6.P2-Pbd2(b), which carried a 15-cM SAMP2 interval on an osteoporotic SAMP6 background, and showed that this Pbd2 locus increased peak BMD in SAMP6.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To narrow down this interval, we generated a new congenic subline P6.P2-13. We studied the effect of this locus on morphological and histomorphological features in vivo and on osteoblasts in vitro. The levels of expression of all genes in the segregated interval were examined, and we clarified the effect of the candidate gene, secreted frizzled-related protein (Sfrp4), on osteoblasts in vitro.
RESULTS: The new congenic strain, P6.P2-13, retained the 2.4-Mb SAMP2 interval on the SAMP6 background, and 11 genes existed in this interval. In morphometrical analysis, P6.P2-13 increased the bone area fraction (BA/TA) by 6.6% at the diaphysial cortex (p < 0.001) and increased the trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) by 54.2% at the distal metaphysis (p < 0.05) in the femora compared with those of SAMP6. The bone formation rate of P6.P2-13 was markedly increased at the periosteal surface of femoral cortex and that was caused by a higher proliferation rate of osteoblasts in P6.P2-13 compared with those in SAMP6. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of calvaria tissue showed approximately 40-fold higher levels of expression of Sfrp4 in SAMP6 than in P6.P2-13. Taken together with the result that recombinant Sfrp4 suppressed the proliferation of osteoblasts, we hypothesized that Sfrp4 inhibited the proliferation of osteoblasts through its antagonistic effect on Wnt signaling. TCF/beta-catenin-dependent reporter activity in osteoblasts derived from SAMP6 showed lower responsiveness for the Wnt ligand, Wnt3A, than that in osteoblasts from P6.P2-13.
CONCLUSIONS: In SAMP6 mice, Sfrp4 negatively regulates bone formation and decreases BMD through the inhibition of Wnt signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17002585     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  39 in total

Review 1.  Aging and bone.

Authors:  A L Boskey; R Coleman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Update on Wnt signaling in bone cell biology and bone disease.

Authors:  David G Monroe; Meghan E McGee-Lawrence; Merry Jo Oursler; Jennifer J Westendorf
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Quantitative trait locus on chromosome X affects bone loss after maturation in mice.

Authors:  Shuzo Okudaira; Motoyuki Shimizu; Bungo Otsuki; Rika Nakanishi; Akira Ohta; Keiichi Higuchi; Masanori Hosokawa; Tadao Tsuboyama; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Bone mineral density is linked to 1p36 and 7p15-13 in a southern Chinese population.

Authors:  Hoi Yee Gloria Li; Wai Chee Annie Kung; Qing Yang Huang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  A Comprehensive Overview of Skeletal Phenotypes Associated with Alterations in Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Humans and Mice.

Authors:  Kevin A Maupin; Casey J Droscha; Bart O Williams
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 13.567

6.  Maf promotes osteoblast differentiation in mice by mediating the age-related switch in mesenchymal cell differentiation.

Authors:  Keizo Nishikawa; Tomoki Nakashima; Shu Takeda; Masashi Isogai; Michito Hamada; Ayako Kimura; Tatsuhiko Kodama; Akira Yamaguchi; Michael J Owen; Satoru Takahashi; Hiroshi Takayanagi
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits.

Authors:  Yoon Shin Cho; Min Jin Go; Young Jin Kim; Jee Yeon Heo; Ji Hee Oh; Hyo-Jeong Ban; Dankyu Yoon; Mi Hee Lee; Dong-Joon Kim; Miey Park; Seung-Hun Cha; Jun-Woo Kim; Bok-Ghee Han; Haesook Min; Younjhin Ahn; Man Suk Park; Hye Ree Han; Hye-Yoon Jang; Eun Young Cho; Jong-Eun Lee; Nam H Cho; Chol Shin; Taesung Park; Ji Wan Park; Jong-Keuk Lee; Lon Cardon; Geraldine Clarke; Mark I McCarthy; Jong-Young Lee; Jong-Koo Lee; Bermseok Oh; Hyung-Lae Kim
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Quantitative trait loci, genes, and polymorphisms that regulate bone mineral density in mouse.

Authors:  Qing Xiong; Yan Jiao; Karen A Hasty; S Terry Canale; John M Stuart; Wesley G Beamer; Hong-Wen Deng; David Baylink; Weikuan Gu
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 9.  WNT Signaling in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: what is the biological significance for the clinician?

Authors:  Liesbet Lodewyckx; Rik J U Lories
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  How genomics has informed our understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mark L Johnson; Nuria Lara; Mohamed A Kamel
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.