Literature DB >> 17002228

Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.

James E Mazur1.   

Abstract

Pigeons responded on concurrent-chains schedules with equal variable-interval schedules as initial links. One terminal link delivered a single reinforcer after a fixed delay, and the other terminal link delivered either three or five reinforcers, each preceded by a fixed delay. Some conditions included a postreinforcer delay after the single reinforcer to equate the total durations of the two terminal links, but other conditions did not include such a postreinforcer delay. With short initial links, preference for the single-reinforcer alternative decreased when a postreinforcer delay was present, but with long initial links, the postreinforcer delays had no significant effect on preference. In conditions with a postreinforcer delay, preference for the single-reinforcer alternative frequently switched from above 50% to below 50% as the initial links were lengthened. This pattern of results was consistent with delay-reduction theory (Squires & Fantino, 1971), but not with the contextual-choice model (Grace, 1994) or the hyperbolic value-added model (Mazur, 2001) as they have usually been applied. However, the hyperbolic value-added model could account for the results if its calculations were expanded to include reinforcers delivered in later terminal links. The implications of these findings for models of concurrent-chains performance are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17002228      PMCID: PMC1592361          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.94-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Two- versus three-alternative concurrent-chain schedules: a test of three models.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-07

3.  Delay and amount of reward in a concurrent chain.

Authors:  M Snyderman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  N Squires; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur; M Snyderman; D Coe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.