Literature DB >> 16997122

The effect of lighting conditions on caries interpretation with a laptop computer in a clinical setting.

Mark J Kutcher1, Sajitha Kalathingal, John B Ludlow, Murillo Abreu, Enrique Platin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis of no difference in caries detection in dim, bright, and hooded environments for laptop viewing of intraoral radiographs. STUDY
DESIGN: Extracted posterior teeth were imaged with posterior bite wing geometry by using storage phosphor plates. Images were displayed on a laptop computer placed in 3 lighting environments. Six dental students and 6 faculty observers scored the caries status of proximal surfaces. Responses were compared to histologic ground truth by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and other measures of accuracy. Performance was also compared to photometer-measured light levels and time spent in observation.
RESULTS: ROC A(Z) was significantly higher for faculty using hooded displays (0.87) than in a bright clinical environment (0.79; P = .04). Student performance was highly variable and not significantly different in any of the lighting environments.
CONCLUSION: The ability to detect caries by experienced clinicians may be improved by hooding laptop displays in bright clinical environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997122     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  11 in total

1.  Effect of ambient light level at the monitor surface on digital radiographic evaluation of approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  K Hellén-Halme; A Lith
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Carious lesions: diagnostic accuracy using pre-calibrated monitor in various ambient light levels: an in vitro study.

Authors:  K Hellén-Halme; A Lith
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.

Authors:  A D Cruz; I C Lobo; A L B Lemos; M F Aguiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.

Authors:  Eduarda Hl Nascimento; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Karla F Vasconcelos; Bernardo B Freire; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Q Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.

Authors:  İsmail H Baltacıoĝlu; Hakan Eren; Yasemin Yavuz; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of horizontal root fractures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hakan Avsever; Kaan Gunduz; Kaan Orhan; Ismail Uzun; Bilal Ozmen; Erol Egrioglu; Muhammed Midilli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A comparative study on image quality of two digital intraoral sensors.

Authors:  Cinar Aziman; Kristina Hellén-Halme; Xie-Qi Shi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors.

Authors:  Sorin Teich; Wisam Al-Rawi; Masahiro Heima; Fady F Faddoul; Gil Goldzweig; Zvi Gutmacher; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.607

10.  Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.