Literature DB >> 16996610

Costs of refractive correction of distance vision impairment in the United States, 1999-2002.

Susan Vitale1, Mary Frances Cotch, Robert Sperduto, Leon Ellwein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Correctable vision impairment caused by refractive error is common in the United States population. We estimated the direct costs of providing eyeglasses to all Americans (age> or =12) who need refractive correction to achieve good distance vision.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of United States citizens. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), age > or = 12 years. The NHANES examines a nationally representative sample of the U.S. noninstitutionalized, civilian population.
METHODS: Presenting and corrected visual acuity data were obtained using an autorefractor from 13,211 (93.0%) of the 14,203 participants who visited the NHANES Mobile Examination Center in 1999 through 2002. Need for refractive correction was defined by current use of corrective lenses for distance vision, improvement to good visual acuity following autorefractor correction (using several cutpoints to define good visual acuity), or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of direct cost for refractive correction (1 pair of complete eyeglasses and a refraction examination) were computed based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedules for 2000 and also based on expenditure data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
RESULTS: The NHANES results indicate that >110 million Americans could or do achieve normal vision with refractive correction. The annual direct cost of correcting distance vision impairment is at least $3.8 billion. Of this amount, $780 million represents the annual cost of providing distance vision correction for persons > age 65.
CONCLUSIONS: Correctable vision impairment due to refractive error is common in the United States population. These cost estimates provide useful information for public health endeavors aimed at provision of refractive correction to those who need it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996610     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  61 in total

Review 1.  RPE and Choroid Mechanisms Underlying Ocular Growth and Myopia.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.622

2.  Prediction of Juvenile-Onset Myopia.

Authors:  Karla Zadnik; Loraine T Sinnott; Susan A Cotter; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Leon Ellwein; Mary Frances Cotch; Frederick L Ferris; Robert Sperduto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

4.  Adenosine receptor distribution in Rhesus monkey ocular tissue.

Authors:  Krista M Beach; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Earl L Smith; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error.

Authors:  T S T Smith; K D Frick; B A Holden; T R Fricke; K S Naidoo
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Self-reported Eyeglass Use by US Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older.

Authors:  Benjamin Otte; Maria A Woodward; Joshua R Ehrlich; Brian C Stagg
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Comparing the Impact of Refractive and Nonrefractive Vision Loss on Functioning and Disability: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Nazlee Zebardast; Bonnielin K Swenor; Suzanne W van Landingham; Robert W Massof; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila K West; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Genetic association of insulin-like growth factor-1 polymorphisms with high-grade myopia in an international family cohort.

Authors:  Ravikanth Metlapally; Chang-Seok Ki; Yi-Ju Li; Khanh-Nhat Tran-Viet; Diana Abbott; Francois Malecaze; Patrick Calvas; David A Mackey; Thomas Rosenberg; Sandrine Paget; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Terri L Young
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  "Can we declare victory and move on?" The case against funding burden-of-disease studies.

Authors:  Steven Kymes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Influence of severity and types of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children in southern China.

Authors:  Li-Li Wang; Wei Wang; Xiao-Tong Han; Ming-Guang He
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.