Literature DB >> 16988425

C. elegans deletion mutant screening.

Robert J Barstead1, Donald G Moerman.   

Abstract

The methods used by the Caenorhabditis elegans Gene Knockout Consortium are conceptually simple. One does a chemical mutagenesis of wild-type C. elegans, and then screens the progeny of the mutagenized animals, in small mixed groups, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify populations with animals where a portion of DNA bounded by the PCR primers has been deleted. Animals from such populations are then selected and grown clonally to recover a pure genetic strain. We categorize the steps needed to do this as follows: (1) mutagenesis and DNA template preparation, (2) PCR detection of deletions, (3) sibling selection, and (4) deletion stabilization. These are discussed in detail in this chapter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16988425     DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-151-7:51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  13 in total

1.  Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Stephane Flibotte; Mark L Edgley; Iasha Chaudhry; Jon Taylor; Sarah E Neil; Aleksandra Rogula; Rick Zapf; Martin Hirst; Yaron Butterfield; Steven J Jones; Marco A Marra; Robert J Barstead; Donald G Moerman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  From genes to function: the C. elegans genetic toolbox.

Authors:  Thomas Boulin; Oliver Hobert
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.814

3.  Retention of induced mutations in a Drosophila reverse-genetic resource.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cooper; Elizabeth A Greene; Bradley J Till; Christine A Codomo; Barbara T Wakimoto; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Introduction to germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Nanette Pazdernik; Tim Schedl
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Forward and reverse mutagenesis in C. elegans.

Authors:  Lena M Kutscher; Shai Shaham
Journal:  WormBook       Date:  2014-01-17

Review 6.  The application of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suhong Xu
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.275

7.  Dynamic analysis identifies novel roles for DLG-1 subdomains in AJM-1 recruitment and LET-413-dependent apical focusing.

Authors:  Christopher A Lockwood; Allison M Lynch; Jeff Hardin
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Oligoarray comparative genomic hybridization-mediated mapping of suppressor mutations generated in a deletion-biased mutagenesis screen.

Authors:  Martin R Jones; Ann M Rose; David L Baillie
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Cell-specific monitoring of protein synthesis in vivo.

Authors:  Nikos Kourtis; Nektarios Tavernarakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  large-scale screening for targeted knockouts in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.