Literature DB >> 16967277

Observer reliability in evaluating pedicle screw placement using computed tomography.

Victor Kosmopoulos1, Nicolas Theumann, Stefano Binaghi, Constantin Schizas.   

Abstract

Pedicle screw insertion in spinal surgery is a demanding technique with potential risks to neurological structures, for example, within the spinal canal. Assessing screw placement in clinical practice has been performed using plain radiographs and/or mainly axial computed tomography (CT) images. Screw placement using CT image reconstructions in multiple planes has been described, but its reliability has yet to be studied. This study aimed at addressing the clinical issue of interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the use of axial and coronal CT images for the assessment of pedicle screw placement. Fifty nine pedicle screws were studied by two experienced radiologists on two separate occasions. Screw placement was classified as "in", "out" or "questionable". On average, 88% and 92% of the screws were classified as "in" by the first and second radiologist, respectively. Intraobserver agreement strength was almost perfect for both observers using either axial or coronal images. Interobserver agreement strength was almost perfect (axial) and substantial (coronal) in the first reading and substantial (axial, coronal) in the second reading. Assessing screw placement in more than one CT imaging plane is not only useful but reliable. Routine use may enhance reporting quality of screw placement by surgeons and radiologists.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16967277      PMCID: PMC2267647          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0230-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  A S Youkilis; D J Quint; J E McGillicuddy; S M Papadopoulos
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  In vivo pedicle screw placement: image-guided virtual vision.

Authors:  A L Carl; H S Khanuja; C A Gatto; M Matsumoto; J vomLehn; J Schenck; K Rohling; W Lorensen; K Vosburgh
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-06

3.  Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Measurement of observer agreement.

Authors:  Harold L Kundel; Marcia Polansky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The accuracy of computed tomography in assessing cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Hak-Sun Kim; John G Heller; Patricia A Hudgins; Jack A Fountain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Single versus separate registration for computer-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Tao-Chen Lee; Lin-Cheng Yang; Po-Chou Liliang; Thung-Ming Su; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Han-Jung Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: a proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas J Learch; Jennifer B Massie; Mini N Pathria; Bradley A Ahlgren; Steven R Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Christopher M Bono; Margaret Black
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries: technique and short-term complications.

Authors:  John J Carbone; P Justin Tortolani; Louis G Quartararo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prospective evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Charles Kuntz; P Colby Maher; Nicholas B Levine; Ryu Kurokawa
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-06
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Aortic injury in spine surgery……What a spine surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Safwan Alomari; Ryan Planchard; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Timothy Witham; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Approach to interpret images produced by new generations of multidetector CT scanners in post-operative spine.

Authors:  Rania Zeitoun; Manar Hussein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Lonjon; Emilie Chan-Seng; Vincent Costalat; Benoit Bonnafoux; Matthieu Vassal; Julien Boetto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging (O-arm) for assessment of pedicle screw position: Does it prevent unacceptable screw placement?

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; David W Polly; Charles Gerald T Ledonio; Edward Rainier G Santos
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

5.  Inter- and intra-observer reliability of measurement of pedicle screw breach assessed by postoperative CT scans.

Authors:  William F Lavelle; Ashish Ranade; Amer F Samdani; John P Gaughan; Linda P D'Andrea; Randal R Betz
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery.

Authors:  Arnold B Vardiman; David J Wallace; Neil R Crawford; Jessica R Riggleman; Leigh A Ahrendtsen; Charles G Ledonio
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-07-19

7.  The Utility of a Digital Virtual Template for Junior Surgeons in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Jie Zhao; Youzhuan Xie; Jie Mi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.