Literature DB >> 23961944

Interactions between Transient and Long-Term Auditory Memory as Reflected by the Mismatch Negativity.

I Winkler1, N Cowan, V Csépe, I Czigler, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

Abstract The mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential (ERP) component is elicited by any discriminable change in series of repetitive auditory stimuli. MMN is generated by a process registering the deviation of the incoming stimulus from the trace of the previous repetitive stimulus. Using MMN as a probe into auditory sensory memory, the present study addressed the question of whether the sensory memory representation is formed strictly on the basis of an automatic feature analysis of incoming sensory stimuli or information from long-term memory is also incorporated. Trains of 6 tone bursts (standards with up to 1 deviant per train) separated by 9.5-sec intertrain intervals were presented to subjects performing a visual tracking task and disregarding the auditory stimuli. Trains were grouped into stimulus blocks of 20 trains with a 2-min rest period between blocks. In the Constant-Standard Condition, both standard and deviant stimuli remained fixed across the session, encouraging the formation of a long-term memory representation. To eliminate the carryover of sensory storage from one train to the next, the first 3.6 sec of the intertrain interval was filled with 6 tones of random frequencies. In the Roving-Standard Condition, the standard changed from train to train and the intervening tones were omitted. It was found that MMN was elicited by deviants presented in Position 2 of the trains in the Constant-Standard Condition revealing that a single reminder of the constant standard reactivated the standard-stimulus representation. The MMN amplitude increased across trials within each stimulus block in the Constant- but not in the Roving-Standard Condition, demonstrating long-term learning in that condition (i.e., the standard-stimulus trace indexed by the MMN amplitude benefitted from the presentations of the constant standard in the previous trains). The present results suggest that the transient auditory sensory memory representation underlying the MMN is facilitated by a longer-term representation of the corresponding stimulus.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 23961944     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.5.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Preattentively grouped tones do not elicit MMN with respect to each other.

Authors:  Walter Ritter; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Sophie Molholm; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Linguistic category structure influences early auditory processing: Converging evidence from mismatch responses and cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Parsing components of auditory predictive coding in schizophrenia using a roving standard mismatch negativity paradigm.

Authors:  Amanda McCleery; Daniel H Mathalon; Jonathan K Wynn; Brian J Roach; Gerhard S Hellemann; Stephen R Marder; Michael F Green
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Deficits in auditory predictive coding in individuals with the psychosis risk syndrome: Prediction of conversion to psychosis.

Authors:  Susanna L Fryer; Brian J Roach; Holly K Hamilton; Peter Bachman; Aysenil Belger; Ricardo E Carrión; Erica Duncan; Jason Johannesen; Gregory A Light; Margaret Niznikiewicz; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry Seidman; Ming Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-08

6.  Impairment in predictive processes during auditory mismatch negativity in ScZ: Evidence from event-related fields.

Authors:  Andreas Sauer; Maor Zeev-Wolf; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marc Recasens; Catherine Wacongne; Michael Wibral; Saskia Helbling; Abraham Peled; Alexander Grinshpoon; Wolf Singer; Abraham Goldstein; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Modelling trial-by-trial changes in the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Jean Daunizeau; Marta I Garrido; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Auditory Pattern Representations Under Conditions of Uncertainty-An ERP Study.

Authors:  Maria Bader; Erich Schröger; Sabine Grimm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Neuronal adaptation, novelty detection and regularity encoding in audition.

Authors:  Manuel S Malmierca; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Carles Escera; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) to pitch change is susceptible to order-dependent bias.

Authors:  Juanita Todd; Andrew Heathcote; Lisa R Whitson; Daniel Mullens; Alexander Provost; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.