Literature DB >> 26468067

Conflict and cooperation in eukaryogenesis: implications for the timing of endosymbiosis and the evolution of sex.

Arunas L Radzvilavicius1, Neil W Blackstone2.   

Abstract

Roughly 1.5-2.0 Gya, the eukaryotic cell evolved from an endosymbiosis of an archaeal host and proteobacterial symbionts. The timing of this endosymbiosis relative to the evolution of eukaryotic features remains subject to considerable debate, yet the evolutionary process itself constrains the timing of these events. Endosymbiosis entailed levels-of-selection conflicts, and mechanisms of conflict mediation had to evolve for eukaryogenesis to proceed. The initial mechanisms of conflict mediation (e.g. signalling with calcium and soluble adenylyl cyclase, substrate carriers, adenine nucleotide translocase, uncouplers) led to metabolic homeostasis in the eukaryotic cell. Later mechanisms (e.g. mitochondrial gene loss) contributed to the chimeric eukaryotic genome. These integral features of eukaryotes were derived because of, and therefore subsequent to, endosymbiosis. Perhaps the greatest opportunity for conflict arose with the emergence of eukaryotic sex, involving whole-cell fusion. A simple model demonstrates that competition on the lower level severely hinders the evolution of sex. Cytoplasmic mixing, however, is beneficial for non-cooperative endosymbionts, which could have used their aerobic metabolism to manipulate the life history of the host. While early evolution of sex may have facilitated symbiont acquisition, sex would have also destabilized the subsequent endosymbiosis. More plausibly, the evolution of sex and the true nucleus concluded the transition.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell fusion; eukaryogenesis; evolutionary conflict; mitochondria; reactive oxygen species; sex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26468067      PMCID: PMC4614496          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  46 in total

1.  Selection for mitonuclear co-adaptation could favour the evolution of two sexes.

Authors:  Zena Hadjivasiliou; Andrew Pomiankowski; Robert M Seymour; Nick Lane
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mitochondrial implication in apoptosis. Towards an endosymbiont hypothesis of apoptosis evolution.

Authors:  G Kroemer
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  On the reorganization of fitness during evolutionary transitions in individuality.

Authors:  Richard E Michod; Aurora M Nedelcu
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 4.  Origin of eukaryotic programmed cell death: a consequence of aerobic metabolism?

Authors:  J M Frade; T M Michaelidis
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  DNA repair and the evolution of transformation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  R E Michod; M F Wojciechowski; M A Hoelzer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The major evolutionary transitions.

Authors:  E Szathmáry; J M Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Calcium binding proteins and calcium signaling in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Delfina C Domínguez; Manita Guragain; Marianna Patrauchan
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.817

8.  The evolution of sex: A new hypothesis based on mitochondrial mutational erosion: Mitochondrial mutational erosion in ancestral eukaryotes would favor the evolution of sex, harnessing nuclear recombination to optimize compensatory nuclear coadaptation.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Matthew D Hall; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Reversed activity of mitochondrial adenine nucleotide translocator in ischemia-reperfusion.

Authors:  Andrey Belous; Clayton Knox; Ian B Nicoud; Janene Pierce; Christopher Anderson; C Wright Pinson; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally?

Authors:  Stephan Greiner; Johanna Sobanski; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.345

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Selfish Mitonuclear Conflict.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Evan S Forsythe; Alissa M Williams; John H Werren; Damian K Dowling; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Adaptive mitochondrial response of the whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei to environmental challenges and pathogens.

Authors:  Chrystian Rodriguez-Armenta; Orlando Reyes-Zamora; Enrique De la Re-Vega; Arturo Sanchez-Paz; Fernando Mendoza-Cano; Ofelia Mendez-Romero; Humberto Gonzalez-Rios; Adriana Muhlia-Almazan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  SymbiQuant: A Machine Learning Object Detection Tool for Polyploid Independent Estimates of Endosymbiont Population Size.

Authors:  Edward B James; Xu Pan; Odelia Schwartz; Alex C C Wilson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  The conflict within: origin, proliferation and persistence of a spontaneously arising selfish mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Joseph James Dubie; Avery Robert Caraway; McKenna Margaret Stout; Vaishali Katju; Ulfar Bergthorsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Fishing for adaptive epistasis using mitonuclear interactions.

Authors:  David M Rand
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Evolving mtDNA populations within cells.

Authors:  Iain G Johnston; Joerg P Burgstaller
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 7.  An Evolutionary Framework for Understanding the Origin of Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Neil W Blackstone
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-27

8.  Mitochondria, the Cell Cycle, and the Origin of Sex via a Syncytial Eukaryote Common Ancestor.

Authors:  Sriram G Garg; William F Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.

Authors:  David M Rand; Jim A Mossman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Transmissible cancers and the evolution of sex under the Red Queen hypothesis.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier; Matthias Galipaud; E Yagmur Erten; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.