Literature DB >> 16951072

A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.

Hamish G Spencer1, Andrew G Clark.   

Abstract

A consequence of genomic imprinting is that offspring are more similar to one parent than to the other, depending on which parent's genes are inactivated in those offspring. We hypothesize that genomic imprinting may have evolved at some loci because of selection to be similar to the parent of one sex or the other. We construct and analyze an evolutionary-genetic model of a two-locus two-deme system, in which one locus codes for a character under local selection and the second locus is a potential cis-acting modifier of imprinting. A proportion of males only migrate between demes every generation, and prebreeding males are less fit, on average, than females. We examine the conditions in which an imprinting modifier allele can invade a population fixed for a nonimprinting modifier allele and vice versa. We find that the conditions under which the imprinting modifier invades are biologically restrictive (high migration rates and high values of recombination between the two loci) and thus this hypothesis is unlikely to explain the evolution of imprinting. Our modeling also shows that, as with several other hypotheses, polymorphism of imprinting status may evolve under certain circumstances, a feature not predicted by verbal accounts.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951072      PMCID: PMC1602075          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.060475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  23 in total

Review 1.  Population genetics and evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evolution of recombination in a constant environment.

Authors:  M W Feldman; F B Christiansen; L D Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Influence of mom and dad: quantitative genetic models for maternal effects and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Anna W Santure; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained?

Authors:  Y Iwasa
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Polymorphic imprinting of the serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor gene in human adult brain.

Authors:  R Bunzel; I Blümcke; S Cichon; S Normann; J Schramm; P Propping; M M Nöthen
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1998-08-15

7.  Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; M W Feldman; A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  A census of mammalian imprinting.

Authors:  Ian M Morison; Joshua P Ramsay; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern.

Authors:  Hopi E Hoekstra; Rachel J Hirschmann; Richard A Bundey; Paul A Insel; Janet P Crossland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mosaic and polymorphic imprinting of the WT1 gene in humans.

Authors:  Y Jinno; K Yun; K Nishiwaki; T Kubota; O Ogawa; A E Reeve; N Niikawa
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; A G Clark
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  How demography, life history, and kinship shape the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman; Laurent Lehmann
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  The evolution of genomic imprinting: theories, predictions and empirical tests.

Authors:  M M Patten; L Ross; J P Curley; D C Queller; R Bonduriansky; J B Wolf
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Evolution of genomic imprinting as a coordinator of coadapted gene expression.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sex-biased dispersal promotes adaptive parental effects.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Revardel; Alain Franc; Rémy J Petit
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.