Literature DB >> 16949765

Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning.

Adeel Kaiser1, Timothy E Schultheiss, Jeffrey Y C Wong, David D Smith, Chunhui Han, Nayana L Vora, Richard D Pezner, Yi-Jen Chen, Eric H Radany.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use pretreatment megavoltage-computed tomography (MVCT) scans to evaluate positioning variations in pitch, roll, and yaw for patients treated with helical tomotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty prostate and 15 head-and-neck cancer patients were selected. Pretreatment MVCT scans were performed before every treatment fraction and automatically registered to planning kilovoltage CT (KVCT) scans by bony landmarks. Image registration data were used to adjust patient setups before treatment. Corrections for pitch, roll, and yaw were recorded after bone registration, and data from fractions 1-5 and 16-20 were used to analyze mean rotational corrections.
RESULTS: For prostate patients, the means and standard deviations (in degrees) for pitch, roll, and yaw corrections were -0.60 +/- 1.42, 0.66 +/- 1.22, and -0.33 +/- 0.83. In head-and-neck patients, the means and standard deviations (in degrees) were -0.24 +/- 1.19, -0.12 +/- 1.53, and 0.25 +/- 1.42 for pitch, roll, and yaw, respectively. No significant difference in rotational variations was observed between Weeks 1 and 4 of treatment. Head-and-neck patients had significantly smaller pitch variation, but significantly larger yaw variation, than prostate patients. No difference was found in roll corrections between the two groups. Overall, 96.6% of the rotational corrections were less than 4 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial rotational setup errors for prostate and head-and-neck patients were all small in magnitude, statistically significant, but did not vary considerably during the course of radiotherapy. The data are relevant to couch hardware design for correcting rotational setup variations. There should be no theoretical difference between these data and data collected using cone beam KVCT on conventional linacs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949765     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

1.  Rotational output and beam quality evaluations for helical tomotherapy with use of a third-party quality assurance tool.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Shimizu; Koji Sasaki; Manabu Iwata; Minoru Kawai; Kuniyasu Nakashima; Takashi Kubota; Hikaru Osaki; Masashi Nakayama; Manabu Yoshimoto; Takeshi Kodaira
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-08-23

2.  Total body irradiation of bone marrow transplant using helical TomoTherapy with a focus on the quality of dose contribution at junction target volumes.

Authors:  N V N Madhusudhana Sresty; Deleep Gudipudi; A Krishnam Raju; T Anil Kumar; V R P Lakshmi; G Srikanth; M Narasimha
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Are pitch and roll compensations required in all pathologies? A data analysis of 2945 fractions.

Authors:  Pietro Mancosu; Giacomo Reggiori; Anna Gaudino; Francesca Lobefalo; Lucia Paganini; Valentina Palumbo; Antonella Stravato; Stefano Tomatis; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Roll and pitch set-up errors during volumetric modulated arc delivery: can adapting gantry and collimator angles compensate?

Authors:  Nienke A Hoffmans-Holtzer; Daan Hoffmans; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance.

Authors:  Hyejoo Kang; Dale M Lovelock; Ellen D Yorke; Sergey Kriminski; Nancy Lee; Howard I Amols
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Todd J Scarbrough; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Coen R N Rasch; Mehee Choi; Joe Y Ting; Samuel J Wang; Niko Papanikolaou; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The effects of rotational setup errors in total body irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Akira Isobe; Keisuke Usui; Naoya Hara; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Six-Dimensional Correction of Intra-Fractional Prostate Motion with CyberKnife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Siyuan Lei; Nathaniel Piel; Eric K Oermann; Viola Chen; Andrew W Ju; Kedar N Dahal; Heather N Hanscom; Joy S Kim; Xia Yu; Guowei Zhang; Brian T Collins; Reena Jha; Anatoly Dritschilo; Simeng Suy; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Low incidence of new biochemical and clinical hypogonadism following hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) monotherapy for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric K Oermann; Simeng Suy; Heather N Hanscom; Joy S Kim; Sue Lei; Xia Yu; Guowei Zhang; Brook Ennis; Joyann P Rohan; Nathaniel Piel; Benjamin A Sherer; Devin Borum; Viola J Chen; Gerald P Batipps; Nicholas L Constantinople; Stephen W Dejter; Gaurav Bandi; John Pahira; Kevin G McGeagh; Lucile Adams-Campbell; Reena Jha; Nancy A Dawson; Brian T Collins; Anatoly Dritschilo; John H Lynch; Sean P Collins
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  Dosimetric impact of rotational setup errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy for postoperative cervical cancer.

Authors:  Katsutomo Tsujii; Yoshihiro Ueda; Masaru Isono; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Teruki Teshima; Masahiko Koizumi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.