Literature DB >> 16949399

Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.

Aaron B Caughey1, James M Nicholson, Yvonne W Cheng, Deirdre J Lyell, A Eugene Washington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies of cesarean delivery (CD) rates among women undergoing induction of labor (IOL) often compare such women to women experiencing spontaneous labor at similar gestational ages. We sought to examine the association between IOL at various gestational ages and CD, accounting for the effect of increased gestational age among the comparison group who were managed expectantly. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all term, singleton, cephalic presentation pregnancies delivered at our institution over 15 years excluding cesarean deliveries before labor. For each gestational age of induction, we created a comparison group of women who were undelivered at that gestational age, and who experienced labor at some future gestational age.
RESULTS: In women undergoing IOL at 38 weeks gestation, the CD rate was 11.9% as compared to 13.3% (P = .42) of women beyond 38 weeks gestation. The CD rate for induction of labor compared to ongoing pregnancy was 14.3% versus 15.0% (P = .62) at 39 weeks, 20.4% versus 19.0% (P = .41) at 40 weeks, and 24.3% versus 26.0% (P = .39) at 41 weeks. When controlling for potential confounding, there was a higher rate of CD among women with expectant management beyond 38 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.80; 95% CI 1.29-2.53), 39 weeks (1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.80), and 40 weeks (AOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that IOL may not increase a woman's risk of CD when compared to expectant management. While this question has been addressed prospectively at 41 weeks gestation, it requires further examination at earlier gestations and among various subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949399     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  26 in total

1.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves.

Authors:  Maisa Feghali; Julia Timofeev; Chun-Chih Huang; Rita Driggers; Menachem Miodovnik; Helain J Landy; Jason G Umans
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; William Grobman; Yuan Zhao; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter VanDorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Spontaneous Labor Onset and Outcomes in Obese Women at Term.

Authors:  Antonina I Frolova; Judy J Wang; Shayna N Conner; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Candice L Woolfolk; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Early Elective Delivery Disparities between Non-Hispanic Black and White Women after Statewide Policy Implementation.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Ifeoma Muoto; Blair G Darney; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 7.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

8.  Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes among laboring nulliparous women.

Authors:  Alan Thevenet N Tita; Yinglei Lai; Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; William A Grobman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Anjali J Kaimal; Jonathan M Snowden; James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Maisa N Feghali; Steve N Caritis; Janet M Catov; Christina M Scifres
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.