Literature DB >> 25068566

Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves.

Maisa Feghali1, Julia Timofeev2, Chun-Chih Huang3, Rita Driggers2, Menachem Miodovnik4, Helain J Landy5, Jason G Umans6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the labor curves of patients who undergo preterm induction of labor (IOL) and to assess possible predictors of vaginal delivery (VD). STUDY
DESIGN: Data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Consortium on Safe Labor were analyzed. A total of 6555 women who underwent medically indicated IOL at <37 weeks of gestation were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on gestational age (GA): group A, 24-27+6 weeks; B, 28-30+6 weeks; C, 31-33+6 weeks; and D, 34-36+6 weeks. Pregnant women with a contraindication to VD, IOL ≥37 weeks of gestation, and without data from cervical examination on admission were excluded. Analysis of variance was used to assess differences between GA groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess predictors of VD. A repeated measures analysis was used to determine average labor curves.
RESULTS: Rates of vaginal live births increased with GA, from 35% (group A) to 76% (group D). Parous women (odds ratio, 6.78; 95% confidence interval, 6.38-7.21) and those with a favorable cervix at the start of IOL (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-2.48) were more likely to deliver vaginally. Analysis of labor curves in nulliparous women showed shorter duration of labor with increasing GA; the active phase of labor was, however, similar across all GAs.
CONCLUSION: Most women who undergo medically indicated preterm IOL between 24 and 36+6 weeks of gestation deliver vaginally. The strongest predictor of VD was parity. Preterm IOL had a limited influence on estimated labor curves across GAs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  induction of labor; labor curve; preterm

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068566      PMCID: PMC4275341          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis.

Authors:  E A FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis.

Authors:  E A FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1956-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; James M Nicholson; Yvonne W Cheng; Deirdre J Lyell; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems.

Authors:  M J Hughey; T W McElin; C C Bird
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Relation of prelabor evaluation to inducibility and the course of labor.

Authors:  E A Friedman; K R Niswander; N P Bayonet-Rivera; M R Sachtleben
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The natural history of the normal first stage of labor.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Julie Beaver; William Fraser
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?

Authors:  A H Nassar; A M Adra; N Chakhtoura; O Gómez-Marín; S Beydoun
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The direct cost of low birth weight.

Authors:  E M Lewit; L S Baker; H Corman; P H Shiono
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995

10.  Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca B Russell; Nancy S Green; Claudia A Steiner; Susan Meikle; Jennifer L Howse; Karalee Poschman; Todd Dias; Lisa Potetz; Michael J Davidoff; Karla Damus; Joann R Petrini
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Impact of Fetal Anomalies on Contemporary Labor Patterns.

Authors:  Anna C McCormick; Jennifer J McIntosh; Weihua Gao; Judith U Hibbard; Meredith O Cruz
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Success of labor induction for pre-eclampsia at preterm and term gestational ages.

Authors:  C Roland; C R Warshak; E A DeFranco
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Recent advances in the induction of labor.

Authors:  Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Outcome of induction and associated factors among induced labours in public Hospitals of Harari Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: A two years' retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yimer Mohammed Beshir; Mohammed Abdurke Kure; Gudina Egata; Kedir Teji Roba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors Predicting Successful Vaginal Delivery Following Induction of Labor in Term Pregnancy.

Authors:  Threebhorn Kamlungkuea; Jittima Manonai; Paibul Suriyawongpaisal; Wirada Hansahiranwadee
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-02-19

6.  Cervical Dilatation Curves of Spontaneous Deliveries in Pregnant Japanese Females.

Authors:  Yusuke Inde; Akihito Nakai; Atsuko Sekiguchi; Masako Hayashi; Toshiyuki Takeshita
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.