Literature DB >> 11142749

The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels.

E Sutter1.   

Abstract

The interpretation of binary kernels derived by means of the mulifocal ERG has frequently been the source of confusion and controversy. The aim of this paper is to provide an intuitive understanding of the concept of kernels and to demonstrate with models and examples, the relationship between the kernels and individual responses. The sample data used to illustrate the various aspects of the technique were derived and analyzed by means of the multifocal VERIS instrument using bipolar Burian-Allen contact lens electrodes. From the kernel data, response waveforms are synthesized that can be readily compared with those obtained with conventional flash, double flash and multi-flash ERG techniques. From the kernels of a single multifocal record, waveforms are synthesized that describe responses at various times after a preceding focal flash. It is shown that the observed adaptive changes in the waveforms depend not only on the flash interval but also on retinal eccentricity. Features on the response waveform exhibit independent adaptive behavior suggesting that they originate from different retinal sources. On one hand, the examples presented here illustrate the rich information on retinal dynamics contained in the kernels. On the other hand, they demonstrate how the interpretation of multifocal data can be facilitated when the kernel series is transformed into representations with more direct physiological appeal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142749     DOI: 10.1023/a:1002702917233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  10 in total

1.  The effect of twin flashes and of repetitive light stimuli on the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  H M BURIAN; B E SPIVEY
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1959-09       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Double-flash electroretinography in human eyes.

Authors:  A C Kooijman; J Zwarts; A Damhof
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The field topography of ERG components in man--I. The photopic luminance response.

Authors:  E E Sutter; D Tran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs.

Authors:  D C Hood; W Seiple; K Holopigian; V Greenstein
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Photoresponses of human rods in vivo derived from paired-flash electroretinograms.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Double-flash responses in different retinal layers.

Authors:  T Schneider; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Double flash human electroretinogram with special reference to the oscillatory potentials and the early phase of dark adaptation: a normative study.

Authors:  M Gjötterberg
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1974

8.  The double-flash ERG in retinal ischemia.

Authors:  H Bornschein; R Gunter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Abnormal activation and inactivation mechanisms of rod transduction in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and the pro-23-his mutation.

Authors:  D G Birch; D C Hood; S Nusinowitz; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Application of twin flash stimuli for some mascular diseases isolation of local responses by twin flashes.

Authors:  M Mitsuyu; Y Honda; A Negi
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-10
  10 in total
  29 in total

1.  Distribution of oscillatory components in the central retina.

Authors:  M A Bearse; Y Shimada; E E Sutter
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Senescence of the temporal impulse response to a luminous pulse.

Authors:  Keizo Shinomori; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  mfERG response dynamics of the aging retina.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Erich E Sutter; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Investigation of the temporal properties of the retina using the m-sequence.

Authors:  Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Malcolm C Brown
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 5.  The electroretinogram: a useful tool for evaluating age-related macular disease?

Authors:  Emma J Berrow; Hannah E Bartlett; Frank Eperjesi; Jonathan M Gibson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shimada; Marcus A Bearse; Erich E Sutter
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Latency of the mfVEP to diagnose glaucoma?

Authors:  M Bach
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Examination of short binary sequences for mfERG recording.

Authors:  Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Malcolm C Brown
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  [Early latency in pattern-reversal and flash mfVEP].

Authors:  J D Unterlauft; T Meigen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  The s-wave of the multifocal electroretinogram in cats.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Miyamoto; Yutaka Tazawa; Akira Hayasaka; Junfuku Nitta; Isao Egawa; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.