Literature DB >> 16942107

Hydration thermodynamic properties of amino acid analogues: a systematic comparison of biomolecular force fields and water models.

Berk Hess1, Nico F A van der Vegt.   

Abstract

We present an extensive study on hydration thermodynamic properties of analogues of 13 amino acid side chains at 298 K and 1 atm. The hydration free energies DeltaG, entropies DeltaS, enthalpies DeltaH, and heat capacities Deltac(P)() were determined for 10 combinations of force fields and water models. The statistical sampling was extended such that precisions of 0.3, 0.8, 0.8 kJ/mol and 25 J/(mol K) were reached for DeltaG, TDeltaS, DeltaH, and Deltac(P)(), respectively. The three force fields used in this study are AMBER99, GROMOS 53A6, and OPLS-AA; the five water models are SPC, SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP4P, and TIP4P-Ew. We found that the choice of water model strongly influences the accuracy of the calculated hydration entropies, enthalpies, and heat capacities, while differences in accuracy between the force fields are small. On the basis of an analysis of the hydrophobic analogues of the amino acid side chains, we discuss what properties of the water models are responsible for the observed discrepancies between computed and experimental values. The SPC/E water model performs best with all three biomolecular force fields.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 16942107     DOI: 10.1021/jp0641029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  61 in total

1.  Multipole electrostatics in hydration free energy calculations.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  The behavior of the hydrophobic effect under pressure and protein denaturation.

Authors:  J Raúl Grigera; Andres N McCarthy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Predicting hydration free energies using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and multiple starting conformations.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Soft-core potentials in thermodynamic integration: comparing one- and two-step transformations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; InSuk Joung; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Charge asymmetries in hydration of polar solutes.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Janene R Baker; Alan E Barber; Christopher J Fennell; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Secondary structure propensities in peptide folding simulations: a systematic comparison of molecular mechanics interaction schemes.

Authors:  Dirk Matthes; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Osmotic Pressure Simulations of Amino Acids and Peptides Highlight Potential Routes to Protein Force Field Parameterization.

Authors:  Mark S Miller; Wesley K Lay; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  β-Barrel mobility underlies closure of the voltage-dependent anion channel.

Authors:  Ulrich Zachariae; Robert Schneider; Rodolfo Briones; Zrinka Gattin; Jean-Philippe Demers; Karin Giller; Elke Maier; Markus Zweckstetter; Christian Griesinger; Stefan Becker; Roland Benz; Bert L de Groot; Adam Lange
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.