Literature DB >> 16939519

Geographic differences in event rates by model for end-stage liver disease score.

J P Roberts1, D M Dykstra, N P Goodrich, S H Rush, R M Merion, F K Port.   

Abstract

The ability of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to accurately predict death among liver transplant candidates allows for evaluation of geographic differences in transplant access for patients with similar death risk. Adjusted models of time to transplant and death for adult liver transplant candidates listed between 2002 and 2003 were developed to test for differences in MELD score among Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions and Donation Service Areas (DSA). The average MELD and relative risk (RR) of death varied somewhat by region (from 0.82 to 1.28), with only two regions having significant differences in RRs. Greater variability existed in adjusted transplant rates by region; 7 of 11 regions differed significantly from the national average. Simulation results indicate that an allocation system providing regional priority to candidates at MELD scores > or = 15 would increase the median MELD score at transplant and reduce the total number of deaths across DSA quintiles. Simulation results also indicate that increasing priority to higher MELD candidates would reduce the percentage variation among DSAs of transplants to patients with MELD scores > or = 15. The variation decrease was due to increasing the MELD score at time of transplantation in the DSAs with the lowest MELD scores at transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939519     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01508.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  20 in total

1.  Moderate ascites identifies patients with low model for end-stage liver disease scores awaiting liver transplantation who have a high mortality risk.

Authors:  Ma Somsouk; Rachel Kornfield; Eric Vittinghoff; John M Inadomi; Scott W Biggins
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Access to liver transplantation in the MELD era: role of ethnicity and insurance.

Authors:  Nyingi Kemmer; Victoria Zacharias; Tiffany E Kaiser; Guy W Neff
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The economic impact of addressing the organ shortage with clinically high-risk allografts.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

4.  Impact of geography on organ allocation: Beyond the distance to the transplantation center.

Authors:  Rony Ghaoui; Jane Garb; Fredric Gordon; Elizabeth Pomfret
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-07-08

5.  Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance under redistricted allocation.

Authors:  Sommer E Gentry; Eric K H Chow; Allan Massie; Xun Luo; Eugene Shteyn; Joshua Pyke; David Zaun; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Bert Kasiske; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.

Authors:  Heidi Yeh; Elizabeth Smoot; David A Schoenfeld; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  D-MELD risk capping improves post-transplant and overall mortality under markov microsimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Halldorson; Robert L Carithers; Renuka Bhattacharya; Ramasamy Bakthavatsalam; Iris W Liou; Andre A Dick; Jorge D Reyes; James D Perkins
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-24

8.  Racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Amit K Mathur; Douglas E Schaubel; Qi Gong; Mary K Guidinger; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.

Authors:  S E Gentry; A B Massie; S W Cheek; K L Lentine; E H Chow; C E Wickliffe; N Dzebashvili; P R Salvalaggio; M A Schnitzler; D A Axelrod; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Sex-based disparities in liver transplant rates in the United States.

Authors:  A K Mathur; D E Schaubel; Qi Gong; M K Guidinger; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.