Literature DB >> 21200366

Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.

Heidi Yeh1, Elizabeth Smoot, David A Schoenfeld, James F Markmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation offers life-saving therapy for patients with decompensated liver disease or T2 hepatocellular carcinomas. In the United States, deceased donor livers are primarily allocated by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score within each of the country's more than 50 donation service areas (DSAs). Variation in DSA size, population, and organ availability have engendered concern that unequal access to deceased donor livers across DSAs contributes to geographic variability in outcome.
METHODS: To determine the extent to which DSA variability in organ availability correlated with combined waitlist and posttransplant mortality, we analyzed retrospectively national waitlist and posttransplant data for a 7-year period after implementation of the current MELD-based allocation system.
RESULTS: Marked variation among DSAs was evident in death rate (3.3-fold), transplant rate (20-fold), and mean transplant MELD (>10 points). Death rate correlated with organ availability was assessed by transplant rate and transplant MELD. DSAs with low organ availability included the country's largest cities, had more new listings per capita, larger waitlists, more transplant centers per DSA, and a higher proportion of black and Asian patients. DSAs of organ shortage were also characterized by more frequent dual listing at another transplant center, more living donor liver transplants, and increased average length of the transplant admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Geographic differences in deceased donor organ availability contribute to variation in overall death rate of liver transplant patients, shape the clinical practice of transplant, and influence the resources consumed per transplant. Geographic variation in organ access results primarily from rates of listing rather than donation. Our findings highlight the need to restructure organ distribution areas to achieve equal access to deceased donor livers for transplantation in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21200366      PMCID: PMC3772346          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182066275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  22 in total

1.  Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites.

Authors:  Andrea E Reid; Maria Resnick; YuChiao Chang; Nathan Buerstatte; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Authors:  M Malinchoc; P S Kamath; F D Gordon; C J Peine; J Rank; P C ter Borg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Equitable allocation of extrarenal organs: with special reference to the liver.

Authors:  T E Starzl; R D Gordon; A Tzakis; S Staschak; V Fioravanti; B Broznick; L Makowka; H T Bahnson
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Prioritization and organ distribution for liver transplantation.

Authors:  O Bronsther; J J Fung; A Izakis; D Van Thiel; T E Starzl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.

Authors:  James F Trotter; Michael J Osgood
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.

Authors:  Niraj M Desai; Kevin C Mange; Michael D Crawford; Peter L Abt; Adam M Frank; Joseph W Markmann; Ergun Velidedeoglu; William C Chapman; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  MELD score predicts 1-year patient survival post-orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sammy Saab; Victor Wang; Ayman B Ibrahim; Francisco Durazo; Steven Han; Douglas G Farmer; Hasan Yersiz; Marcia Morrisey; Leonard I Goldstein; R Mark Ghobrial; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Pretransplant MELD score and post liver transplantation survival in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  Mathew Jacob; Lynn P Copley; James D Lewsey; Alex Gimson; Giles J Toogood; Mohamed Rela; Jan H P van der Meulen
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan.

Authors:  Richard B Freeman; Russell H Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Ann Harper; Robert Merion; Robert Wolfe
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  46 in total

1.  Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Joshua Pyke; David P Schladt; Sommer E Gentry; Tim Weaver; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Same policy, different impact: Center-level effects of share 35 liver allocation.

Authors:  Douglas R Murken; Allison W Peng; David D Aufhauser; Peter L Abt; David S Goldberg; Matthew H Levine
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Futility and rationing in liver retransplantation: when and how can we say no?

Authors:  Scott W Biggins
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Geographic Disparity in Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Rates Following Share 35.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Sheng Zhou; Eric K H Chow; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Multiple listings as a reflection of geographic disparity in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Parsia A Vagefi; Sandy Feng; Jennifer L Dodge; James F Markmann; John P Roberts
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.

Authors:  Christine E Haugen; Tanveen Ishaque; Abel Sapirstein; Alexander Cauneac; Dorry L Segev; Sommer Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance.

Authors:  Sommer E Gentry; Eric K H Chow; Allan Massie; Xun Luo; David Zaun; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Bert Kasiske; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Helen Fu; Warren T McKinney; David Schladt; Jon J Snyder; W Ray Kim; Jack R Lake; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Viability testing of discarded livers with normothermic machine perfusion: Alleviating the organ shortage outweighs the cost.

Authors:  Siavash Raigani; Reinier J De Vries; Cailah Carroll; Ya-Wen Chen; David C Chang; Stuti G Shroff; Korkut Uygun; Heidi Yeh
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  Are there geographical disparities in access to liver transplantation in Atlantic Canada?

Authors:  Paul Douglas Renfrew; Michele Molinari
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.