Literature DB >> 11550525

Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system?

M Chatterjee1, M E Robert.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants restore auditory sensitivity to the profoundly hearing-impaired by means of electrical stimulation of residual auditory nerve fibers. Sensorineural hearing loss results in a loss of spontaneous activity among the remaining auditory neurons and is accompanied by a reduction in the normal stochastic nature of neural firing in response to electric stimulation. It has been hypothesized that the natural stochasticity of the neural response is important for auditory signal processing and that introducing some optimal amount of noise into the stimulus may improve auditory perception through the implant. In this article we show that, for soft but audible stimuli, an optimal amount of "prosthetic" noise significantly improves sensitivity to envelope modulation in cochlear implant listeners. A nonmonotonic function relates modulation sensitivity and noise level, suggesting the presence of stochastic resonance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11550525      PMCID: PMC3201182          DOI: 10.1007/s101620010079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  19 in total

1.  The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Robert P Morse; Peter F Morse; Terry B Nunn; Karen A M Archer; Patrick Boyle
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-12

2.  Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Katherine R Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

4.  Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Cherish Oberzut
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A neuron model of stochastic resonance using rectangular pulse trains.

Authors:  Zachary Danziger; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 8.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

10.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Jian Yu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.