Literature DB >> 12181585

Stochastic resonance in psychophysics and in animal behavior.

Lawrence M Ward1, Alexander Neiman, Frank Moss.   

Abstract

A recent analysis of the energy detector model in sensory psychophysics concluded that stochastic resonance does not occur in a measure of signal detectability ( d'), but can occur in a percent-correct measure of performance as an epiphenomenon of nonoptimal criterion placement [Tougaard (2000) Biol Cybern 83: 471-480]. When generalized to signal detection in sensory systems in general, this conclusion is a serious challenge to the idea that stochastic resonance could play a significant role in sensory processing in humans and other animals. It also seems to be inconsistent with recent demonstrations of stochastic resonance in sensory systems of both nonhuman animals and humans using measures of system performance such as signal-to-noise ratio of power spectral densities and percent-correct detections in a two-interval forced-choice paradigm, both closely related to d'. In this paper we address this apparent dilemma by discussing several models of how stochastic resonance can arise in signal detection systems, including especially those that implement a "soft threshold" at the input transform stage. One example involves redefining d' for energy increments in terms of parameters of the spike-count distribution of FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons. Another involves a Poisson spike generator that receives an exponentially transformed noisy periodic signal. In this case it can be shown that the signal-to-noise ratio of the power spectral density at the signal frequency, which exhibits stochastic resonance, is proportional to d'. Finally, a variant of d' is shown to exhibit stochastic resonance when calculated directly from the distributions of power spectral densities at the signal frequency resulting from transformation of noise alone and a noisy signal by a sufficiently steep nonlinear response function. All of these examples, and others from the literature, imply that stochastic resonance is more than an epiphenomenon, although significant limitations to the extent to which adding noise can aid detection do exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12181585     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-002-0328-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  22 in total

1.  Mechanical noise enhances signal transmission in the bullfrog sacculus.

Authors:  Andrew A Indresano; Jonathan E Frank; Pameia Middleton; Fernán Jaramillo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Stochastic resonance within the somatosensory system: effects of noise on evoked field potentials elicited by tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Elías Manjarrez; Gerardo Rojas-Piloni; Ignacio Méndez; Amira Flores
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Vibratory noise to the fingertip enhances balance improvement associated with light touch.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dynamic encoding of amplitude-modulated sounds at the level of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  L K Rimskaya-Korsakova; V N Telepnev; N A Dubrovksii
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01

5.  Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Acute effects of stochastic resonance whole body vibration.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Jasmine Zahno; Jan Taeymans; Angela Blasimann; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 8.  Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).

Authors:  Bhanu Shukla; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory.

Authors:  Claudio A Perez; José R Donoso; Leonel E Medina
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 10.  What is stochastic resonance? Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Derek Abbott
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.