BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Olive cultivars and their wild relatives (oleasters) represent two botanical varieties of Olea europaea subsp. europaea (respectively europaea and sylvestris). Olive cultivars have undergone human selection and their area of diffusion overlaps that of oleasters. Populations of genuine wild olives seem restricted to isolated areas of Mediterranean forests, while most other wild-looking forms of olive may include feral forms that escaped cultivation. METHODS: The genetic structure of wild and cultivated olive tree populations was evaluated by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers at a microscale level in one continental and two insular Italian regions. KEY RESULTS: The observed patterns of genetic variation were able to distinguish wild from cultivated populations and continental from insular regions. Island oleasters were highly similar to each other and were clearly distinguishable from those of continental regions. Ancient cultivated material from one island clustered with the wild plants, while the old plants from the continental region clustered with the cultivated group. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, we can assume that olive trees have undergone a different selection/domestication process in the insular and mainland regions. The degree of differentiation between oleasters and cultivated trees on the islands suggests that all cultivars have been introduced into these regions from the outside, while the Umbrian cultivars have originated either by selection from local oleasters or by direct introduction from other regions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Olive cultivars and their wild relatives (oleasters) represent two botanical varieties of Olea europaea subsp. europaea (respectively europaea and sylvestris). Olive cultivars have undergone human selection and their area of diffusion overlaps that of oleasters. Populations of genuine wild olives seem restricted to isolated areas of Mediterranean forests, while most other wild-looking forms of olive may include feral forms that escaped cultivation. METHODS: The genetic structure of wild and cultivated olive tree populations was evaluated by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers at a microscale level in one continental and two insular Italian regions. KEY RESULTS: The observed patterns of genetic variation were able to distinguish wild from cultivated populations and continental from insular regions. Island oleasters were highly similar to each other and were clearly distinguishable from those of continental regions. Ancient cultivated material from one island clustered with the wild plants, while the old plants from the continental region clustered with the cultivated group. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, we can assume that olive trees have undergone a different selection/domestication process in the insular and mainland regions. The degree of differentiation between oleasters and cultivated trees on the islands suggests that all cultivars have been introduced into these regions from the outside, while the Umbrian cultivars have originated either by selection from local oleasters or by direct introduction from other regions.
Authors: Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard; James L Weber; Howard M Cann; Kenneth K Kidd; Lev A Zhivotovsky; Marcus W Feldman Journal: Science Date: 2002-12-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: V. Bronzini De Caraffa; J. Maury; C. Gambotti; C. Breton; A. Bervillé; J. Giannettini Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2002-04-05 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Heidi G Parker; Lisa V Kim; Nathan B Sutter; Scott Carlson; Travis D Lorentzen; Tiffany B Malek; Gary S Johnson; Hawkins B DeFrance; Elaine A Ostrander; Leonid Kruglyak Journal: Science Date: 2004-05-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: G Besnard; B Khadari; M Navascués; M Fernández-Mazuecos; A El Bakkali; N Arrigo; D Baali-Cherif; V Brunini-Bronzini de Caraffa; S Santoni; P Vargas; V Savolainen Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Abdullah A Abood; Abdullah M Al-Ansari; Hussein M Migdadi; Mohammad K Okla; Abdulaziz M Assaeed; Ahmad K Hegazy; Aref M Alshameri; Mohamad Altaf Khan Journal: 3 Biotech Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Soraya Mousavi; Roberto Mariotti; Francesca Bagnoli; Lorenzo Costantini; Nicolò G M Cultrera; Kazem Arzani; Saverio Pandolfi; Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin; Bahareh Torkzaban; Mehdi Hosseini-Mazinani; Luciana Baldoni Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.357