Literature DB >> 16917774

Target width scaling in a repetitive aiming task: switching between cyclical and discrete units of action.

John J Buchanan1, Jin-Hoon Park, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

An aiming task was used to identify the processes whereby the motor system adapted a repetitive aiming action to systematic changes in ID (ID = log(2 )(2A/W), Fitts in J Exp Psychol 47:381-391, 1954) within a single trial. Task ID was scaled in a trial by moving the outside edge of two stationary targets to produce nine different target IDs in a trail. The ID within a trial was scaled in one of two directions: (1) an increasing ID condition, starting with an ID = 3.07 and ending with an ID = 5.91; and (2) a decreasing ID condition, starting with an ID = 5.91 and ending with an ID = 3.07. An index of movement harmonicity (Guiard in Acta Psychol 82:139-159, 1993) revealed that the repetitive aiming action was harmonic in nature when task ID was 3.07, and consisted of a series of discrete segments when task ID was 5.91. This finding provides evidence for the existence of discrete and cyclical units of action that are irreducible and that may be employed independently to assemble longer continuous actions. The scaling of ID within a trial promoted a transition in repetitive aiming motions assembled from discrete and cyclical units of action. A variety of kinematic measures (e.g., movement harmonicity, time spent accelerating the limb) revealed a critical ID (ID(c)) region (4.01-4.91) separating aiming motions governed by the different units of action. Enhancement of fluctuations before the transition were found in the movement harmonicity data and in the distance traveled to peak velocity data, with variability in these measures highest in the ID(c) region. The enhancement of fluctuations indicates that loss of stability in the limb's motion acted as a key mechanism underlying the transition between units of action. The loss of stability was associated with the transition from cyclical to discrete actions and with the transition from discrete to cyclical actions. The transition between units of action may be conceptualized as a transition from a limit cycle attractor (cyclical unit of action) to a shift between two fixed-point attractors (discrete unit of action) when ID was increased, with the transition occurring in the opposite direction when ID was decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917774     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0589-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmical aiming.

Authors:  D Mottet; R J Bootsma
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Symmetry breaking dynamics of human multilimb coordination.

Authors:  J A Kelso; J J Jeka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete.

Authors:  Stefan Schaal; Dagmar Sternad; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Coordination.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-08

5.  Evaluating the coordination dynamics of handwriting.

Authors:  Sylvie Athènes; Isabelle Sallagoïty; Pier-Giorgio Zanone; Jean-Michel Albaret
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns.

Authors:  J A Kelso; J J Buchanan; S A Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Synchronous bimanual movements performed by homologous and non-homologous muscles.

Authors:  L Cohen
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1971-04

8.  Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury.

Authors:  H I Krebs; M L Aisen; B T Volpe; N Hogan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  J J Buchanan; J A Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  C J Winstein; P S Pohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  38 in total

1.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

2.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual influences on Fitts' law.

Authors:  A J Kovacs; J J Buchanan; C H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Flexibility in the control of rapid aiming actions.

Authors:  John J Buchanan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Optimal control of a hybrid rhythmic-discrete task: the bouncing ball revisited.

Authors:  Renaud Ronsse; Kunlin Wei; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Bimanual force control: cooperation and interference?

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-07

8.  Do accuracy requirements change bimanual and unimanual control processes similarly?

Authors:  Chaoyi Wang; Jason B Boyle; Boyi Dai; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Moving the arm at different rates: slow movements are avoided.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Dagmar Sternad; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.