Literature DB >> 16917165

Perceived self-motion in two visual contexts: dissociable mechanisms underlie perception.

W Geoffrey Wright1, Paul DiZio, James R Lackner.   

Abstract

We evaluated the influence of moving visual scenes and knowledge of spatial and physical context on visually induced self-motion perception in an immersive virtual environment. A sinusoidal, vertically oscillating visual stimulus induced perceptions of self-motion that matched changes in visual acceleration. Subjects reported peaks of perceived self-motion in synchrony with peaks of visual acceleration and opposite in direction to visual scene motion. Spatial context was manipulated by testing subjects in the environment that matched the room in the visual scene or by testing them in a separate chamber. Physical context was manipulated by testing the subject while seated in a stable, earth-fixed desk chair or in an apparatus capable of large linear motions, however, in both conditions no actual motion occurred. The compellingness of perceived self-motion was increased significantly when the spatial context matched the visual input and actual body displacement was possible, however, the latency and amplitude of perceived self-motion were unaffected by the spatial or physical context. We propose that two dissociable processes are involved in self-motion perception: one process, primarily driven by visual input, affects vection latency and path integration, the other process, receiving cognitive input, drives the compellingness of perceived self-motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  10 in total

1.  Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vection induced by low-level motion extracted from complex animation films.

Authors:  Wataru Suzuki; Takeharu Seno; Wakayo Yamashita; Noritaka Ichinohe; Hiroshige Takeichi; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Treadmill experience alters treadmill effects on perceived visual motion.

Authors:  Yoshiko Yabe; Hama Watanabe; Gentaro Taga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of timing delay between visual and vestibular stimuli on heading perception.

Authors:  Raul Rodriguez; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Effects of auditory information on self-motion perception during simultaneous presentation of visual shearing motion.

Authors:  Shigehito Tanahashi; Kaoru Ashihara; Hiroyasu Ujike
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 8.  Using virtual reality to augment perception, enhance sensorimotor adaptation, and change our minds.

Authors:  W Geoffrey Wright
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-08

Review 9.  Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Robert S Allison; Mark M Schira; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-27

10.  Beyond sensory conflict: The role of beliefs and perception in motion sickness.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Christopher J Bockisch; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.