Literature DB >> 16913937

Mutation accumulation in space and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Marcel Salathé1, Rahel Salathé, Paul Schmid-Hempel, Sebastian Bonhoeffer.   

Abstract

The maintenance of sexual reproduction remains one of the major puzzles of evolutionary biology, since, all else being equal, an asexual mutant should have a twofold fitness advantage over the sexual wildtype. Most theories suggest that sex helps either to purge deleterious mutations, or to adapt to changing environments. Both mechanisms have their limitations if they act in isolation because they require either high genomic mutation rates or very virulent pathogens, and it is therefore often thought that they must act together to maintain sex. Typically, however, these theories have in common that they are not based on spatial processes. Here, we show that local dispersal and local competition can explain the maintenance of sexual reproduction as a means of purging deleterious mutations. Using a spatially explicit individual-based model, we find that even with reasonably low genomic mutation rates and large total population sizes, asexual clones cannot invade a sexual population. Our results demonstrate how spatial processes affect mutation accumulation such that it can fully erode the twofold benefit of asexuality faster than an asexual clone can take over a sexual population. Thus, the cost of sex is generally overestimated in models that ignore the effects of space on mutation accumulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16913937     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00942.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  10 in total

1.  Sexual selection and its effect on the fixation of an asexual clone.

Authors:  Marcel Salathé
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Richard E Michod
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.

Authors:  Alexander O B Whitlock; Kayla M Peck; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  What does the geography of parthenogenesis teach us about sex?

Authors:  Anaïs Tilquin; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Population structure and diversity in sexual and asexual populations of the pathogenic fungus Melampsora lini.

Authors:  Luke G Barrett; Peter H Thrall; Jeremy J Burdon; Adrienne B Nicotra; Celeste C Linde
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  How populations persist when asexuality requires sex: the spatial dynamics of coping with sperm parasites.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja U Heubel; Daniel J Rankin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Jessica M Bouchard; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Theory and associated phenomenology for intrinsic mortality arising from natural selection.

Authors:  Justin Werfel; Donald E Ingber; Yaneer Bar-Yam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sexual reproduction with variable mating systems can resist asexuality in a rock-paper-scissors dynamics.

Authors:  Juan Carranza; Vicente Polo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.