Literature DB >> 16911204

Bayesian identification of admixture events using multilocus molecular markers.

Jukka Corander1, Pekka Marttinen.   

Abstract

Bayesian statistical methods for the estimation of hidden genetic structure of populations have gained considerable popularity in the recent years. Utilizing molecular marker data, Bayesian mixture models attempt to identify a hidden population structure by clustering individuals into genetically divergent groups, whereas admixture models target at separating the ancestral sources of the alleles observed in different individuals. We discuss the difficulties involved in the simultaneous estimation of the number of ancestral populations and the levels of admixture in studied individuals' genomes. To resolve this issue, we introduce a computationally efficient method for the identification of admixture events in the population history. Our approach is illustrated by analyses of several challenging real and simulated data sets. The software (baps), implementing the methods introduced here, is freely available at http://www.rni.helsinki.fi/~jic/bapspage.html.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911204     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02994.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  159 in total

1.  Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data.

Authors:  Elena Bitocchi; Laura Nanni; Elisa Bellucci; Monica Rossi; Alessandro Giardini; Pierluigi Spagnoletti Zeuli; Giuseppina Logozzo; Jens Stougaard; Phillip McClean; Giovanna Attene; Roberto Papa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Segregation distortion causes large-scale differences between male and female genomes in hybrid ants.

Authors:  Jonna Kulmuni; Bernhard Seifert; Pekka Pamilo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An empirical assessment of individual-based population genetic statistical techniques: application to British pig breeds.

Authors:  S Wilkinson; C Haley; L Alderson; P Wiener
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms.

Authors:  David Weetman; Craig S Wilding; Keith Steen; João Pinto; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Nucleotide diversity of a genomic sequence similar to SHATTERPROOF (PvSHP1) in domesticated and wild common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Authors:  L Nanni; E Bitocchi; E Bellucci; M Rossi; D Rau; G Attene; P Gepts; R Papa
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Two boundaries separate Borrelia burgdorferi populations in North America.

Authors:  Gabriele Margos; Jean I Tsao; Santiago Castillo-Ramírez; Yvette A Girard; Sarah A Hamer; Anne Gatewood Hoen; Robert S Lane; Steve L Raper; Nicholas H Ogden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The devil is in the details: the effect of population structure on demographic inference.

Authors:  P Orozco-terWengel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Species coherence in the face of karyotype diversification in holocentric organisms: the case of a cytogenetically variable sedge (Carex scoparia, Cyperaceae).

Authors:  Marcial Escudero; Jaime A Weber; Andrew L Hipp
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Efficacy of population structure analysis with breeding populations and inbred lines.

Authors:  José Marcelo Soriano Viana; Mágno Sávio Ferreira Valente; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; Gabriel Borges Mundim; Geísa Pinheiro Paes
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Bayesian clustering and feature selection for cancer tissue samples.

Authors:  Pekka Marttinen; Samuel Myllykangas; Jukka Corander
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.