Literature DB >> 23723260

Species coherence in the face of karyotype diversification in holocentric organisms: the case of a cytogenetically variable sedge (Carex scoparia, Cyperaceae).

Marcial Escudero1, Jaime A Weber, Andrew L Hipp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The sedge genus Carex, the most diversified angiosperm genus of the northern temperate zone, is renowned for its holocentric chromosomes and karyotype variability. The genus exhibits high variation in chromosome numbers both among and within species. Despite the possibility that this chromosome evolution may play a role in the high species diversity of Carex, population-level patterns of molecular and cytogenetic differentiation in the genus have not been extensively studied.
METHODS: Microsatellite variation (11 loci, 461 individuals) and chromosomal diversity (82 individuals) were investigated in 22 Midwestern populations of the North American sedge Carex scoparia and two Northeastern populations. KEY
RESULTS: Among Midwestern populations, geographic distance is the most important predictor of genetic differentiation. Within populations, inbreeding is high and chromosome variation explains a significant component of genetic differentiation. Infrequent dispersal among populations separated by >100 km explains an important component of molecular genetic and cytogenetic diversity within populations. However, karyotype variation and correlation between genetic and chromosomal variation persist within populations even when putative migrants based on genetic data are excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate dispersal and genetic connectivity among widespread populations that differ in chromosome numbers, explaining the phenomenon of genetic coherence in this karyotypically diverse sedge species. More generally, the study suggests that traditional sedge taxonomic boundaries demarcate good species even when those species encompass a high range of chromosomal diversity. This finding is important evidence as we work to document the limits and drivers of biodiversity in one of the world's largest angiosperm genera.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carex scoparia; Cyperaceae; gene flow; holocentric chromosomes; karyotype evolution; microsatellites; sedge; simple sequence repeats; species coherence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23723260      PMCID: PMC3718211          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  45 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Tamara S Haselkorn; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Isolation of 11 polymorphic tri- and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci in a North American sedge (Carex scoparia: Cyperaceae) and cross-species amplification in three additional Carex species.

Authors:  Andrew L Hipp; Karin M Kettenring; Kevin A Feldheim; Jaime A Weber
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Chromosome number evolves independently of genome size in a clade with nonlocalized centromeres (Carex: Cyperaceae).

Authors:  Kyong-Sook Chung; Andrew L Hipp; Eric H Roalson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; J Whitton; K Gardner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.

Authors:  M Nei; F Tajima; Y Tateno
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Chromosomes tell half of the story: the correlation between karyotype rearrangements and genetic diversity in sedges, a group with holocentric chromosomes.

Authors:  Andrew L Hipp; Paul E Rothrock; Richard Whitkus; Jaime A Weber
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  The east-west-north colonization history of the Mediterranean and Europe by the coastal plant Carex extensa (Cyperaceae).

Authors:  M Escudero; P Vargas; P Arens; N J Ouborg; M Luceño
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Unprecedented within-species chromosome number cline in the Wood White butterfly Leptidea sinapis and its significance for karyotype evolution and speciation.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Vlad Dincă; Gerard Talavera; Roger Vila
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  4 in total

1.  Do holocentric chromosomes represent an evolutionary advantage? A study of paired analyses of diversification rates of lineages with holocentric chromosomes and their monocentric closest relatives.

Authors:  José Ignacio Márquez-Corro; Marcial Escudero; Modesto Luceño
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Chromosome-scale genome assemblies and annotations for Poales species Carex cristatella, Carex scoparia, Juncus effusus, and Juncus inflexus.

Authors:  Jose Planta; Yu-Ya Liang; Haoyang Xin; Matthew T Chansler; L Alan Prather; Ning Jiang; Jiming Jiang; Kevin L Childs
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.542

3.  Two closely related species differ in their regional genetic differentiation despite admixing.

Authors:  Lisanna Schmidt; Markus Fischer; Tatjana Oja
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Holocentric chromosomes.

Authors:  Mauro Mandrioli; Gian Carlo Manicardi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.