Literature DB >> 20551978

An empirical assessment of individual-based population genetic statistical techniques: application to British pig breeds.

S Wilkinson1, C Haley, L Alderson, P Wiener.   

Abstract

Recently developed Bayesian genotypic clustering methods for analysing genetic data offer a powerful tool to evaluate the genetic structure of domestic farm animal breeds. The unit of study with these approaches is the individual instead of the population. We aimed to empirically evaluate various individual-based population genetic statistical methods for characterization of genetic diversity and structure of livestock breeds. Eighteen British pig populations, comprising 819 individuals, were genotyped at 46 microsatellite markers. Three Bayesian genotypic clustering approaches, principle component analysis (PCA) and phylogenetic reconstruction were applied to individual multilocus genotypes to infer the genetic structure and diversity of the British pig breeds. Comparisons of the three Bayesian genotypic clustering methods (STRUCTURE, BAPS and STRUCTURAMA) revealed some broad similarities but also some notable differences. Overall, the methods agreed that majority of the British pig breeds are independent genetic units with little evidence of admixture. The three Bayesian genotypic clustering methods provided complementary, biologically credible clustering solutions but at different levels of resolution. BAPS detected finer genetic differentiation and in some cases, populations within breeds. Consequently, it estimated a greater number of underlying genetic populations (K, in the notation of Bayesian clustering methods). Two of the Bayesian methods (STRUCTURE and BAPS) and phylogenetic reconstruction provided similar success in assignment of individuals, supporting the use of these methods for breed assignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551978      PMCID: PMC3183882          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  29 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Livestock genetic origins: goats buck the trend.

Authors:  D E MacHugh; D G Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The Bayesian revolution in genetics.

Authors:  Mark A Beaumont; Bruce Rannala
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Patterns of molecular genetic variation among cat breeds.

Authors:  Marilyn Menotti-Raymond; Victor A David; Solveig M Pflueger; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Claire M Wade; Stephen J O'Brien; Warren E Johnson
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Defining population boundaries: use of three Bayesian approaches with microsatellite data from British natterjack toads (Bufo calamita).

Authors:  G Rowe; T J C Beebee
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites.

Authors:  A M Bowcock; A Ruiz-Linares; J Tomfohrde; E Minch; J R Kidd; L L Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Genetic diversity within and between European pig breeds using microsatellite markers.

Authors:  M SanCristobal; C Chevalet; C S Haley; R Joosten; A P Rattink; B Harlizius; M A M Groenen; Y Amigues; M-Y Boscher; G Russell; A Law; R Davoli; V Russo; C Désautés; L Alderson; E Fimland; M Bagga; J V Delgado; J L Vega-Pla; A M Martinez; M Ramos; P Glodek; J N Meyer; G C Gandini; D Matassino; G S Plastow; K W Siggens; G Laval; A L Archibald; D Milan; K Hammond; R Cardellino
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Population structure and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures of populations.

Authors:  Jukka Corander; Pekka Marttinen; Jukka Sirén; Jing Tang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  KLFDAPC: a supervised machine learning approach for spatial genetic structure analysis.

Authors:  Xinghu Qin; Charleston W K Chiang; Oscar E Gaggiotti
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.994

2.  Genetic structure in the Amazonian catfish Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii: influence of life history strategies.

Authors:  F M Carvajal-Vallejos; F Duponchelle; E Desmarais; F Cerqueira; S Querouil; J Nuñez; C García; J-F Renno
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Signatures of diversifying selection in European pig breeds.

Authors:  Samantha Wilkinson; Zen H Lu; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Alan L Archibald; Chris Haley; Ian J Jackson; Martien A M Groenen; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Rob Ogden; Pamela Wiener
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Genomic data illuminates demography, genetic structure and selection of a popular dog breed.

Authors:  Pamela Wiener; Enrique Sánchez-Molano; Dylan N Clements; John A Woolliams; Marie J Haskell; Sarah C Blott
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  The population and landscape genetics of the European badger (Meles meles) in Ireland.

Authors:  Jimena Guerrero; Andrew W Byrne; John Lavery; Eleanor Presho; Gavin Kelly; Emily A Courcier; James O'Keeffe; Ursula Fogarty; Denise B O'Meara; Dennis Ensing; Carl McCormick; Roman Biek; Robin A Skuce; Adrian R Allen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Genomic analysis of the rare British Lop pig and identification of distinctive genomic markers.

Authors:  Georgios Banos; Andrea Talenti; Dimitrios Chatziplis; Enrique Sánchez-Molano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Development of a genetic tool for product regulation in the diverse British pig breed market.

Authors:  Samantha Wilkinson; Alan L Archibald; Chris S Haley; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen; Pamela Wiener; Rob Ogden
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Taxonomist's Nightmare … Evolutionist's Delight : An Integrative Approach Resolves Species Limits in Jumping Bristletails Despite Widespread Hybridization and Parthenogenesis.

Authors:  Thomas Dejaco; Melitta Gassner; Wolfgang Arthofer; Birgit C Schlick-Steiner; Florian M Steiner
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 9.160

9.  Impact of merging commercial breeding lines on the genetic diversity of Landrace pigs.

Authors:  Ina Hulsegge; Mario Calus; Rita Hoving-Bolink; Marcos Lopes; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Kor Oldenbroek
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.