Literature DB >> 16911140

Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative.

Kerry A Silvia1, Karen R Sepucha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many decision aids have been developed to help patients make treatment and screening decisions; however, little is known about implementing them into routine clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of implementing a patient decision aid (PtDA) for the early stage breast cancer surgical decision into routine clinical care.
DESIGN: Structured individual interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of providers from nine sites, including two community resource centres, a community hospital and six academic centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Usage data, barriers to and resources for implementing the PtDAs.
RESULTS: Six of the nine sites were using the PtDAs with patients. Two sites were primarily using a scheduling system and four sites relied on a lending system. For the academic centres, the keys to successful implementation included integrating the PtDA into the flow of patients through the centre and having physicians who recommended it to patients. At the community centres, the keys to successful implementation included an informed staff and the flexibility to get the PtDAs to patients in different ways. Barriers that limited or prevented sites from using the PtDA included a lack of clinical support, a lack of system support, competing priorities and scheduling problems.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to implement a breast cancer PtDA into routine clinical care at academic centres and community resource centres. Future research should assess the effectiveness of PtDAs in routine clinical care as well as resources and barriers to their implementation in community hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911140      PMCID: PMC5060360          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00393.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  15 in total

Review 1.  Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; H Llewellyn-Thomas; V Entwistle; A Coulter; A O'Connor; D R Rovner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

2.  Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Floyd J Fowler; Albert G Mulley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement?

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Development and evaluation of a decision aid for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Valerie Fiset; Annette M. O'Connor; William Evans; Ian Graham; Catherine Degrasse; Jo Logan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A. Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy or lumpectomy? The choice of operation for clinical stages I and II breast cancer (summary of the 2002 update).

Authors:  Hugh Scarth; Jacques Cantin; Mark Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Ian S Watt; Ken Gilhooly; Carol Bugge; Neva Haites; Anne E Walker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-10

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A qualitative study of physicians' perceptions of three decision aids.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; Annette O'Connor; Karen E Weeks; Shawn Aaron; Ann Cranney; Robert Dales; Thomas Elmslie; Paul Hebert; Elaine Jolly; Andreas Laupacis; Susan Mitchell; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-07
View more
  21 in total

1.  Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.

Authors:  Haiyan Qu; Xuejun Hu; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Supporting participation in clinical research: decision aids for trial recruitment?

Authors:  Vikki Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Management of Chronic Pain: Improving shared decision making in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Gillian Hawker; Geoff Dervin; Ivan Tomek; Nan Cochran; Peter Tugwell; Annette M O'Connor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-08

4.  Development and pilot testing of a communication aid to assist clinicians to communicate with women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Simone E De Morgan; Phyllis N Butow; Elizabeth A Lobb; Melanie A Price; Caroline Nehill
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  What does it take to have sustained use of decision aids? A programme evaluation for the Breast Cancer Initiative.

Authors:  Sandra Feibelmann; Theresa S Yang; Ekeoma E Uzogara; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Conducting implementation research in community-based primary care: a qualitative study on integrating patient decision support interventions for cancer screening into routine practice.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Kirsty J Singer; Stefan Timmermans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources.

Authors:  Kerry A Silvia; Elissa M Ozanne; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Vanita Bhavnani; Brian Fisher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making.

Authors:  Lisa J M Caldon; Karen A Collins; Malcolm W Reed; Stephanie Sivell; Joan Austoker; Alison M Clements; Julietta Patnick; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Web-Based Information on Breast Cancer Patients' Knowledge of Surgical Treatment Options.

Authors:  Jennifer L Tucholka; Dou-Yan Yang; Jordan G Bruce; Nicole M Steffens; Jessica R Schumacher; Caprice C Greenberg; Lee G Wilke; Jennifer Steiman; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.