Literature DB >> 12389766

What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement?

Angela Coulter1, Glyn Elwyn.   

Abstract

Patient involvement is being encouraged by the government and by others as a way of improving the quality of the service provided in general practice. Patients can be involved in their own individual care; for example, in treatment decision making and in disease management; or collectively, by providing feedback on aspects of practice organisation and quality. Active participation in treatment decisions and in self management of chronic conditions can benefit patients in the short-term and may lead to better health outcomes in the longer term, although the evidence for this is currently equivocal. However, the ethical and societal arguments in its favour seem overwhelming. Helping patients to help themselves makes sense for general practitioners as well. Strengthening patients' coping skills could help to reduce inappropriate demands on their time. Involving the public in quality improvement activities has become a key policy direction, and trusts will be required to survey their patients on an annual basis. The proposed new general practitioner contract has recognised the importance of the patient's perspective in its quality framwork. Practices that want to anticipate these trends should look for patient survey instruments to obtain feedback on their organisation and the interpersonal skills of the clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12389766      PMCID: PMC1316137     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  27 in total

1.  Preparation and training: the key to better patient involvement.

Authors:  S McIver
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  A 'Third Way' for lay involvement: what evidence so far?

Authors:  S Pickard; K Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

Authors:  J Ramsay; J L Campbell; S Schroter; J Green; M Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Qualitative study of views of health professionals and patients on guided self management plans for asthma.

Authors:  A Jones; R Pill; S Adams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

6.  Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.

Authors:  C Kennelly; A Bowling
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

7.  Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care.

Authors:  E Murray; H Davis; S S Tai; A Coulter; A Gray; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

8.  Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care.

Authors:  E Murray; H Davis; S S Tai; A Coulter; A Gray; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

9.  The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction.

Authors:  E Krupat; S L Rosenkranz; C M Yeager; K Barnard; S M Putnam; T S Inui
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

10.  Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; R Gwyn; R Grol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18
View more
  21 in total

1.  The journey towards patient-centredness.

Authors:  George Freeman; Josip Car; Alison Hill
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Coping with an Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives on the Role of the Health Care System.

Authors:  K M Islam; Samuel T Opoku; Bettye A Apenteng; Ann Fetrick; June Ryan; M Copur; Addison Tolentino; Irfan Vaziri; Apar K Ganti
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Supporting self-care in general practice.

Authors:  Colin J Greaves; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative.

Authors:  Kerry A Silvia; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patient's quality of life and coping style influence general practitioner's management in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: the Krimpen Study.

Authors:  Esther T Kok; Arthur M Bohnen; J L H Ruud Bosch; Siep Thomas; Frans P M J Groeneveld
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  [Treat-to-target from the perspective of office-based rheumatology].

Authors:  K Krüger; K Karberg
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.

Authors:  A Niroshan Siriwardena; Adrian Gk Edwards; Peter Campion; Adrian Freeman; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Care planning for long-term conditions – a concept mapping.

Authors:  Monique Lhussier; Simon Eaton; Natalie Forster; Mathew Thomas; Sue Roberts; Susan M Carr
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  An evaluation of websites providing patient information on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I lung cancer in three Western European countries.

Authors:  Wendy Hopmans; Naomi E Verstegen; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Olga C Damman; Ben J Slotman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Suresh Senan
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2012

10.  Frequency of GP communication addressing the patient's resources and coping strategies in medical interviews: a video-based observational study.

Authors:  Trond A Mjaaland; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.