Literature DB >> 16911136

Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions.

Maria L Jibaja-Weiss1, Robert J Volk, Lois C Friedman, Thomas S Granchi, Nancy E Neff, Stephen J Spann, Emily K Robinson, Noriaki Aoki, J Robert Beck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on the initial testing of a values clarification exercise utilizing a jewellery box within a computerized patient decision aid (CPtDA) designed to assist women in making a surgical breast cancer treatment decision.
DESIGN: Pre-post design, with patients interviewed after diagnosis, and then after completing the CPtDA sometime later at their preoperative visit. SAMPLE: Fifty-one female patients, who are low literate and naïve computer users, newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer from two urban public hospitals. INTERVENTION: A computerized decision aid that combines entertainment-education (edutainment) with enhanced (factual) content. An interactive jewellery box is featured to assist women in: (1) recording and reflecting over issues of concern with possible treatments, (2) deliberating over surgery decision, and (3) communicating with physician and significant others. OUTCOMES: Patients' use of the jewellery box to store issues during completion of the CPtDA, and perceived clarity of values in making a treatment decision, as measured by a low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).
RESULTS: Over half of the participants utilized the jewellery box to store issues they found concerning about the treatments. On average, users flagged over 13 issues of concern with the treatments. Scores on the DCS Uncertainty and Feeling Unclear about Values subscales were lower after the intervention compared to before the decision was made.
CONCLUSIONS: A values clarification exercise using an interactive jewellery box may be a promising method for promoting informed treatment decision making by low literacy breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911136      PMCID: PMC5060365          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00386.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  21 in total

1.  Cancer risk communication-what we need to learn.

Authors:  E Maibach
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Edwin R Fisher; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  V Goel; C A Sawka; E C Thiel; E H Gort; A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Patients' health-care decision making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life.

Authors:  S Molenaar; M A Sprangers; E J Rutgers; E J Luiten; J Mulder; P M Bossuyt; J J van Everdingen; P Oosterveld; H C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Low-income women with early-stage breast cancer: physician and patient decision-making styles.

Authors:  K L McVea; W C Minier; J E Johnson Palensky
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A. Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Health status versus utilities of patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  Cindy L Bryce; Derek C Angus; JoAnn Switala; Mark S Roberts; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cancer patient and survivor research from the cancer information service research consortium: a preview of three large randomized trials and initial lessons learned.

Authors:  Alfred C Marcus; Michael A Diefenbach; Annette L Stanton; Suzanne M Miller; Linda Fleisher; Peter C Raich; Marion E Morra; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Zung Vu Tran; Mary Anne Bright
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-02-28

2.  Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Sarah T Hawley; Suzanne Kneuper; Stephen J Spann; Brian J Miles; David J Hyman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-29

3.  Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Don Nutbeam; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  A computer-tailored intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Anshu P Mohllajee; Rachel C Shelton; Bettina F Drake; Dana R Mars
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2008-10-20

5.  Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; France Légaré; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-09-03

Review 6.  Assessing the quality and communicative aspects of patient decision aids for early-stage breast cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruben Vromans; Kim Tenfelde; Steffen Pauws; Mies van Eenbergen; Ingeborg Mares-Engelberts; Galina Velikova; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Emiel Krahmer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Effective interventions to improve the health literacy of cancer patients.

Authors:  Loreto Fernández-González; Paulina Bravo-Valenzuela
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-10-10

Review 8.  Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Lewis Carpenter; Hayley Dolan; Paulina Bravo; Mala Mann; Frances Bunn; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kimberly R Enard; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Geetanjali R Kamath; Nickell M Dixon; Robert J Volk
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Ania Syrowatka; Dörthe Krömker; Ari N Meguerditchian; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.