Literature DB >> 18771875

Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients.

Dominick L Frosch1, France Légaré, Carol M Mangione.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of informational brochures and video decision aids about cancer screening on patient intention to engage in shared decision-making and its predictors in a racially diverse sample.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from 13 community-based primary care practices serving racially and ethnically diverse patients in predominately economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Participants completed theory-based measures assessing attitudes, perceived social norms, self-efficacy and intentions for working with their physician to make a cancer screening decision after reviewing a brochure or video decision aid, but before seeing the physician. A post-questionnaire assessed screening decisions and participant knowledge.
RESULTS: Participants who reviewed a video decision aid had higher knowledge and were more likely to want to be the primary decision-maker. They reported lower perceived social norms, self-efficacy and intentions to work with their physicians than participants who reviewed a brochure. Participants who decided against cancer screening reported lower intentions to work with their physician in making a decision and were less likely to report having spoken with their physician about screening.
CONCLUSION: Participants who opted against cancer screening after reviewing a brochure or decision aid were less likely to discuss their decision with their physician. The tendency toward autonomous decision-making was stronger among participants who reviewed a video decision aid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18771875      PMCID: PMC2892794          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  33 in total

1.  The role of theory in HIV prevention.

Authors:  M Fishbein
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia Dolan Mullen; Jennifer Dacey Allen; Karen Glanz; Maria E Fernandez; Deborah J Bowen; Sandi L Pruitt; Beth A Glenn; Michael Pignone
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-12

3.  A cross-cultural consumer-based decision aid for screening mammography.

Authors:  V A Lawrence; D Streiner; H P Hazuda; R Naylor; M Levine; A Gafni
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Robert J Volk; Lois C Friedman; Thomas S Granchi; Nancy E Neff; Stephen J Spann; Emily K Robinson; Noriaki Aoki; J Robert Beck
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Diane Valade; Catherine Orlowski; Catherine Draus; Barbara Nabozny-Valerio; Susan Keiser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; John E Wennberg; France Legare; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Benjamin W Moulton; Karen R Sepucha; Andrea G Sodano; Jaime S King
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  David M Radosevich; Melissa R Partin; Sean Nugent; David Nelson; Ann Barry Flood; Jeremy Holtzman; Nancy Dillon; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-08

8.  Utilizing computerized entertainment education in the development of decision aids for lower literate and naïve computer users.

Authors:  Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Robert J Volk
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov

9.  Validation of a tool to assess health practitioners' decision support and communication skills.

Authors:  Pierrette Guimond; Helen Bunn; Annette M O'Connor; Mary Jane Jacobsen; Valerie K Tait; Elizabeth R Drake; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey; Tom Elmslie
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-07

10.  Effectiveness of a computerized decision aid in primary care on decision making and quality of life in menorrhagia: results of the MENTIP randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joanne Protheroe; Peter Bower; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Tim J Peters; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  26 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients: Promoting Informed and Shared Decisions.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Richard Hoffman; Andrew McWilliams; Michael P Pignone; Robert L Rhyne; Hazel Tapp; Mark A Weaver; Danelle Callan; Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez; Khalil Harbi; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aubri S Hoffman; Lisa M Lowenstein; Geetanjali R Kamath; Ashley J Housten; Viola B Leal; Suzanne K Linder; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Gottumukkala S Raju; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Promoting decision aid use in primary care using a staff member for delivery.

Authors:  Kylee M Miller; Alison Brenner; Jennifer M Griffith; Michael P Pignone; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 4.  Patient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Suzanne K Linder; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Geetanjali R Kamath; Daniel S Reuland; Smita S Saraykar; Viola B Leal; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Helping men make an informed decision about prostate cancer screening: a pilot study of telephone counseling.

Authors:  Mary E Costanza; Roger S Luckmann; Milagros Rosal; Mary Jo White; Nancy LaPelle; Melissa Partin; Caroline Cranos; Katherine G Leung; Christine Foley
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-06-15

6.  Conducting implementation research in community-based primary care: a qualitative study on integrating patient decision support interventions for cancer screening into routine practice.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Kirsty J Singer; Stefan Timmermans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The effect of different cardiovascular risk presentation formats on intentions, understanding and emotional affect: a randomised controlled trial using a web-based risk formatter (protocol).

Authors:  Cherry-Ann Waldron; John Gallacher; Trudy van der Weijden; Robert Newcombe; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Gurpreet K Rana; Sarah Hawley; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Karen Kelly-Blake; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  EXACKTE(2): exploiting the clinical consultation as a knowledge transfer and exchange environment: a study protocol.

Authors:  France Légaré; Moira Stewart; Dominick Frosch; Jeremy Grimshaw; Michel Labrecque; Martine Magnan; Mathieu Ouimet; Michel Rousseau; Dawn Stacey; Trudy van der Weijden; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Adjuncts or adversaries to shared decision-making? Applying the Integrative Model of behavior to the role and design of decision support interventions in healthcare interactions.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; France Légaré; Martin Fishbein; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.