Literature DB >> 16909230

Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.

Julie J Neiworth1, Janice M Hassett, Cara J Sylvester.   

Abstract

This study tests whether the face-processing system of humans and a nonhuman primate species share characteristics that would allow for early and quick processing of socially salient stimuli: a sensitivity toward conspecific faces, a sensitivity toward highly practiced face stimuli, and an ability to generalize changes in the face that do not suggest a new identity, such as a face differently oriented. The look rates by adult tamarins and humans toward conspecific and other primate faces were examined to determine if these characteristics are shared. A visual paired comparison (VPC) task presented subjects with either a human face, chimpanzee face, tamarin face, or an object as a sample, and then a pair containing the previous stimulus and a novel stimulus was presented. The stimuli were either presented all in an upright orientation, or all in an inverted orientation. The novel stimulus in the pair was either an orientation change of the same face/object or a new example of the same type of face/object, and the stimuli were shown either in an upright orientation or in an inverted orientation. Preference to novelty scores revealed that humans attended most to novel individual human faces, and this effect decreased significantly if the stimuli were inverted. Tamarins showed preferential looking toward novel orientations of previously seen tamarin faces in the upright orientation, but not in an inverted orientation. Similarly, their preference to look longer at novel tamarin and human faces within the pair was reduced significantly with inverted stimuli. The results confirmed prior findings in humans that novel human faces generate more attention in the upright than in the inverted orientation. The monkeys also attended more to faces of conspecifics, but showed an inversion effect to orientation change in tamarin faces and to identity changes in tamarin and human faces. The results indicate configural processing restricted to particular kinds of primate faces by a New World monkey species, with configural processing influenced by life experience (human faces and tamarin faces) and specialized to process orientation changes specific to conspecific faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909230     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  14 in total

1.  Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  The evolution of face processing in primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Roberto A Gulli; Lauren H Howard; Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Amy M Ryan; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

5.  Visual discrimination of male and female faces by infant rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Annika Paukner; Mary E Huntsberry; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Thatcher effect in monkeys demonstrates conservation of face perception across primates.

Authors:  Ikuma Adachi; Dina P Chou; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  The evolution of holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Darren Burke; Danielle Sulikowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31

10.  The face inversion effect in non-human primates revisited - an investigation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Malte J Rasch; Masaki Tomonaga; Ikuma Adachi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.