Literature DB >> 26545599

The interaction of two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch, with Cry protein production and predation by Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) in Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton and Cry1F maize.

Yan-Yan Guo1,2, Jun-Ce Tian3, Wang-Peng Shi2, Xue-Hui Dong4, Jörg Romeis5, Steven E Naranjo6, Richard L Hellmich7,8, Anthony M Shelton9.   

Abstract

Crops producing insecticidal crystal (Cry) proteins from the bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), are an important tool for managing lepidopteran pests on cotton and maize. However, the effects of these Bt crops on non-target organisms, especially natural enemies that provide biological control services, are required to be addressed in an environmental risk assessment. Amblyseius andersoni (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is a cosmopolitan predator of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), a significant pest of cotton and maize. Tri-trophic studies were conducted to assess the potential effects of Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton and Cry1F maize on life history parameters (survival rate, development time, fecundity and egg hatching rate) of A. andersoni. We confirmed that these Bt crops have no effects on the biology of T. urticae and, in turn, that there were no differences in any of the life history parameters of A. andersoni when it fed on T. urticae feeding on Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab or non-Bt cotton and Cry1F or non-Bt maize. Use of a susceptible insect assay demonstrated that T. urticae contained biologically active Cry proteins. Cry proteins concentrations declined greatly as they moved from plants to herbivores to predators and protein concentration did not appear to be related to mite density. Free-choice experiments revealed that A. andersoni had no preference for Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton or Cry1F maize-reared T. urticae compared with those reared on non-Bt cotton or maize. Collectively these results provide strong evidence that these crops can complement other integrated pest management tactics including biological control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological control; Cry1Ac; Cry1F; Cry2Ab; Environmental risk assessment; Tri-trophic exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26545599     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-015-9917-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  32 in total

1.  Assessment of prey-mediated effects of the coleopteran-specific toxin Cry3Bb1 on the generalist predator Atheta coriaria (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae).

Authors:  M García; F Ortego; P Castañera; G P Farinós
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Changes in Cry1Ac Bt transgenic cotton in response to two environmental factors: temperature and insect damage.

Authors:  K M Olsen; J C Daly; E J Finnegan; R J Mahon
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Detlef Bartsch; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Marco M C Gielkens; Susan E Hartley; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Paul C Jepson; Raymond Layton; Hector Quemada; Alan Raybould; Robyn I Rose; Joachim Schiemann; Mark K Sears; Anthony M Shelton; Jeremy Sweet; Zigfridas Vaituzis; Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies.

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Jeffrey D Wolt; Brian A Federici; Ramon Albajes; Franz Bigler; Elisabeth P J Burgess; Galen P Dively; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Louise A Malone; Richard Roush; Mark Sears; Frantisek Sehnal
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Anthony J Conner; Travis R Glare; Jan-Peter Nap
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Appropriate analytical methods are necessary to assess nontarget effects of insecticidal proteins in GM crops through meta-analysis (response to Andow et al. 2009).

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Jeffrey D Wolt; Brian A Federici; Ramon Albajes; Franz Bigler; Elisabeth P J Burgess; Galen P Dively; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Louise A Malone; Richard Roush; Mark Sears; Frantisek Sehnal; Natalie Ferry; Howard A Bell
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.377

7.  [Compared biology and behavior of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Bollgard and non-transgenic isoline cotton].

Authors:  Alberto B Esteves Filho; José V de Oliveira; Jorge B Torres; Manoel G C Gondim
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.434

8.  Errors in logic and statistics plague a meta-analysis (response to Andow and Lövei 2012).

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.377

9.  When bad science makes good headlines: Bt maize and regulatory bans.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Morven A McLean; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Using field-evolved resistance to Cry1F maize in a lepidopteran pest to demonstrate no adverse effects of Cry1F on one of its major predators.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Hilda L Collins; Jörg Romeis; Steven E Naranjo; Richard L Hellmich; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.788

View more
  1 in total

1.  No Interactions of Stacked Bt Maize with the Non-target Aphid Rhopalosiphum padi and the Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae.

Authors:  Yinghua Shu; Jörg Romeis; Michael Meissle
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.