Literature DB >> 35769657

Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Fabio Mancino1, Vincenzo Di Matteo1, Fabrizio Mocini1, Silvia Pietramala1, Alessandro Singlitico1, Andrea De Fazio1, Vincenzo La Vergata2, Giorgio Gasparini3, Giulio Maccauro1, Ivan De Martino2.   

Abstract

Background: Several studies have evaluated the outcomes of tantalum cones in revision knee arthroplasty with moderate-to-severe metaphyseal bone defects. However, recent innovations have led to the development of 3-D printed titanium cones to better adapt to host bone, there remains no consensus on their overall performance. Objective: We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to examine short-term survivorship and complication rates of their usage in revision TKAs.
Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for English articles using various combinations of keywords.
Results: In all, 7 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 687 cones were implanted in 557 revision TKAs. The all-cause revision-free survivorship of the implants was 95.3% (26 revisions), and of the cones was 95.5% (31 cones revised) at mean 24 months follow-up. The cones revision-free survivorship from aseptic loosening was 99.7%. The overall complication rate was 19.7% with infection as the most common complications observed and the most frequent reason for revision with an incidence of 10.4% and 4.1%, respectively. Overall, functional outcomes improved as documented by postoperative knee scores.
Conclusion: 3-D printed metal cones represent a reliable option in metaphyseal bone defects reconstruction that provides high fixation, good short-term survivorship, and complications rates in line with similar devices. In addition, they are associated with lower intraoperative complications, and higher survivorship from aseptic loosening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printed; bone reconstruction; knee revision arthroplasty; metal cones; metaphyseal bone defect

Year:  2022        PMID: 35769657      PMCID: PMC9235418          DOI: 10.52965/001c.35891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)        ISSN: 2035-8164


  37 in total

1.  Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G A Engh; P J Herzwurm; N L Parks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

3.  Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Nicholas M Desy; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; Michael J Taunton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ethan A Remily; Iciar M Dávila Castrodad; Nequesha S Mohamed; Wayne A Wilkie; Margaret N Kelemen; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 5.  Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction.

Authors:  G A Engh; D J Ammeen
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1999

6.  Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew W Tetreault; Kevin I Perry; Mark W Pagnano; Arlen D Hanssen; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Paul A Lotke; Jane Kim; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Is varus-valgus constraint a reliable option in complex primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Francesco Falez; Fabrizio Mocini; Peter K Sculco; Giulio Maccauro; Ivan De Martino
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-06

9.  Additive manufacturing of porous titanium metaphyseal components: Early osseointegration and implant stability in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas England; Joseph Pagkalos; Lee Jeys; Rajesh Botchu; Richard Carey Smith
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-24

10.  Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Seung-Hun Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Hong-An Lim; Hong-Yeol Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.