Literature DB >> 19051300

A novel biomimetic polymer scaffold design enhances bone ingrowth.

Chris P Geffre1, David S Margolis, John T Ruth, Donald W DeYoung, Brandi C Tellis, John A Szivek.   

Abstract

There has been recent interest in treating large bone defects with polymer scaffolds because current modalities such as autographs and allographs have limitations. Additionally, polymer scaffolds are utilized in tissue engineering applications to implant and anchor tissues in place, promoting integration with surrounding native tissue. In both applications, rapid and increased bone growth is crucial to the success of the implant. Recent studies have shown that mimicking native bone tissue morphology leads to increased osteoblastic phenotype and more rapid mineralization. The purpose of this study was to compare bone ingrowth into polymer scaffolds created with a biomimetic porous architecture to those with a simple porous design. The biomimetic architecture was designed from the inverse structure of native trabecular bone and manufactured using solid free form fabrication. Histology and muCT analysis demonstrated a 500-600% increase in bone growth into and adjacent to the biomimetic scaffold at five months post-op. This is in agreement with previous studies in which biomimetic approaches accelerated bone formation. It also supports the applicability of polymer scaffolds for the treatment of large tissue defects when implanting tissue-engineering constructs. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19051300      PMCID: PMC2767470          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  66 in total

1.  An instrumented scaffold can monitor loading in the knee joint.

Authors:  J A Szivek; C L Bliss; C P Geffre; D S Margolis; D W DeYoung; J T Ruth; A B Schnepp; B C Tellis; R K Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R D Maddox; J M Taboas
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  The limitations of canine trabecular bone as a model for human: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  J L Kuhn; S A Goldstein; M J Ciarelli; L S Matthews
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Ingrowth of bone into pores in titanium chambers implanted in rabbits: effect of pore cross-sectional shape in the presence of dynamic shear.

Authors:  S Goodman; S Toksvig-Larsen; P Aspenberg
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-02

5.  Missing osteoconductive effect of a resorbable PEO/PBT copolymer in human bone defects: a clinically relevant pilot study with contrary results to previous animal studies.

Authors:  M Roessler; A Wilke; P Griss; H Kienapfel
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000

6.  Long-term intermittent compressive stimulation improves the composition and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Stephen D Waldman; Caroline G Spiteri; Marc D Grynpas; Robert M Pilliar; Rita A Kandel
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

7.  An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R A Levy; T M Chu; J W Halloran; S E Feinberg
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Porous HA ceramic for bone replacement: role of the pores and interconnections - experimental study in the rabbit.

Authors:  B Flautre; M Descamps; C Delecourt; M C Blary; P Hardouin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Resorbable materials and composites. New concepts in orthopedic biomaterials.

Authors:  J R Parsons
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Calvarial bone repair with porous D,L-polylactide.

Authors:  B P Robinson; J O Hollinger; E H Szachowicz; J Brekke
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Biodegradable composite scaffolds incorporating an intramedullary rod and delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 for stabilization and bone regeneration in segmental long bone defects.

Authors:  A M Henslee; P P Spicer; D M Yoon; M B Nair; V V Meretoja; K E Witherel; J A Jansen; A G Mikos; F K Kasper
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Citrate-based biphasic scaffolds for the repair of large segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Richard T Tran; Denghui Xie; Yuchen Wang; Dianna Y Nguyen; Ethan Gerhard; Jinshan Guo; Jiajun Tang; Zhongming Zhang; Xiaochun Bai; Jian Yang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.396

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.