Literature DB >> 16901836

Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.

James R Roney1, Katherine N Hanson, Kristina M Durante, Dario Maestripieri.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether women track possible cues of paternal and genetic quality in men's faces and then map perception of those cues onto mate attractiveness judgments. Men's testosterone concentrations served as a proxy for genetic quality given evidence that this hormone signals immunocompetence, and men's scores on an interest in infants test were chosen as prima facie markers of paternal quality. Women's perceptions of facial photographs of these men were in fact sensitive to these two variables: men's scores on the interest in infants test significantly predicted women's ratings of the photos for how much the men like children, and men's testosterone concentrations significantly predicted women's ratings of the men's faces for masculinity. Furthermore, men's actual and perceived affinity for children predicted women's long-term mate attractiveness judgments, while men's testosterone and perceived masculinity predicted women's short-term mate attractiveness judgments. These results suggest that women can detect facial cues of men's hormone concentrations and affinity for children, and that women use perception of these cues to form mate attractiveness judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16901836      PMCID: PMC1635527          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Janelle Chan; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The "trouble" with salivary testosterone.

Authors:  Douglas A Granger; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Alan Booth; Katie T Kivlighan; Eve B Schwartz
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.905

3.  Accuracy in social perception: contributions of facial and vocal information.

Authors:  D S Berry
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-08

4.  The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; J A Simpson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.

Authors:  M R Cunningham; A P Barbee; C L Pike
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07

6.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K J Lee; I Penton-Voak; D Rowland; S Yoshikawa; D M Burt; S P Henzi; D L Castles; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Father absence, menarche and interest in infants among adolescent girls.

Authors:  Dario Maestripieri; James R Roney; Nicole DeBias; Kristina M Durante; Geertrui M Spaepen
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-11

8.  Sex differences in interest in infants across the lifespan : A biological adaptation for parenting?

Authors:  Dario Maestripieri; Suzanne Pelka
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-09

9.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness.

Authors:  K Grammer; R Thornhill
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins; Christine E Garver-Apgar; P Niels Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03
View more
  26 in total

1.  Social transmission of face preferences among humans.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Anthony C Little; Robert P Burriss; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Life history of female preferences for male faces: a comparison of pubescent girls, nonpregnant and pregnant young women, and middle-aged women.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-12

3.  Unacquainted callers can predict which citizens will vote over and above citizens' stated self-predictions.

Authors:  Todd Rogers; Leanne Ten Brinke; Dana R Carney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes.

Authors:  Dustin J Penn; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Aaron W Lukazsweski; Michael Townsley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males.

Authors:  Lee T Gettler; Thomas W McDade; Alan B Feranil; Christopher W Kuzawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in human male faces.

Authors:  F R Moore; R E Cornwell; M J Law Smith; E A S Al Dujaili; M Sharp; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity.

Authors:  Nicholas Pound; Ian S Penton-Voak; Alison K Surridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby; Daniel Sznycer; Christopher von Rueden; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Neural Activation in Women in Response to Masculinized Male Faces: Mediation by Hormones and Psychosexual Factors.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Thomas W James; Ellen D Ketterson; Dale R Sengelaub; Erick Janssen; Julia R Heiman
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.178

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.