Literature DB >> 16899609

High progesterone receptor expression correlates to the effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients.

Maria Stendahl1, Lisa Rydén, Bo Nordenskjöld, Per Ebbe Jönsson, Göran Landberg, Karin Jirström.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen has long been the drug of choice in adjuvant endocrine therapy of steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and it still remains important due to its well-documented beneficial effect. Hormone receptor status is often reported as "positive" or "negative" using 10% positive nuclei as a cutoff. In this study, we aimed to assess whether a further subclassification of hormone receptor status could enhance the treatment predictive value. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was quantified in tissue microarrays with tumors from 500 premenopausal breast cancer patients previously included in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen compared with an untreated control group.
RESULTS: Our findings show a gradually increasing tamoxifen effect in tumors with >10% ER-positive nuclei. However, when analyzing tamoxifen response according to various PR fractions, we found that it was primarily patients with tumors showing >75% PR-positive nuclei that responded to tamoxifen treatment, with an improved recurrence-free [relative risk, 0.42 (0.25-0.70); P = 0.001] as well as overall [relative risk, 0.49 (0.28-0.84); P = 0.010] survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant tamoxifen improved recurrence-free and overall survival for premenopausal patients with tumors showing >75% PR-positive nuclei. No effect could be shown in tumors with fewer PR-positive nuclei. The PR was a stronger predictor of treatment response than the ER. Based on these findings, we suggest the implementation of a fractioned rather than dichotomized immunohistochemical evaluation of hormone receptors in clinical practice, possibly with greater emphasis on the PR than the ER.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899609     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  48 in total

1.  MR imaging features of invasive breast cancer correlated with hormonal receptors: does progesterone receptor matter?

Authors:  J H Chen; O Nalcioglu; M Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Loss of nuclear localized and tyrosine phosphorylated Stat5 in breast cancer predicts poor clinical outcome and increased risk of antiestrogen therapy failure.

Authors:  Amy R Peck; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Chengbao Liu; Ginger A Stringer; Alexander C Klimowicz; Edward Pequignot; Boris Freydin; Thai H Tran; Ning Yang; Anne L Rosenberg; Jeffrey A Hooke; Albert J Kovatich; Marja T Nevalainen; Craig D Shriver; Terry Hyslop; Guido Sauter; David L Rimm; Anthony M Magliocco; Hallgeir Rui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Deciphering the divergent roles of progestogens in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason S Carroll; Theresa E Hickey; Gerard A Tarulli; Michael Williams; Wayne D Tilley
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Can predictive biomarkers in breast cancer guide adjuvant endocrine therapy?

Authors:  Karin Beelen; Wilbert Zwart; Sabine C Linn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Steroid hormone receptors as prognostic markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C Louie; Mary B Sevigny
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Evaluation of three commercial progesterone receptor assays in a single tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gene Young Cho; Linda Moy; Sungheon G Kim; Steven H Baete; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Protein expression profile and prevalence pattern of the molecular classes of breast cancer--a Saudi population based study.

Authors:  Dalal M Al Tamimi; Mohamed A Shawarby; Ayesha Ahmed; Ammar K Hassan; Amal A AlOdaini
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Molecular profiles of progesterone receptor loss in human breast tumors.

Authors:  Chad J Creighton; C Kent Osborne; Marc J van de Vijver; John A Foekens; Jan G Klijn; Hugo M Horlings; Dimitry Nuyten; Yixin Wang; Yi Zhang; Gary C Chamness; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Adrian V Lee; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.