Literature DB >> 27562489

Evaluation of three commercial progesterone receptor assays in a single tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort.

Elizabeth N Kornaga1, Alexander C Klimowicz2, Natalia Guggisberg1, Travis Ogilvie3, Don G Morris1,4, Marc Webster4, Anthony M Magliocco5.   

Abstract

Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status are routinely assessed using immunohistochemistry assays to assist in patient prognosis and clinical management. Three commonly utilized autostainer vendors-Dako, Leica and Ventana-provide ready-to-use progesterone receptor assays; however, they have never been directly compared in a single breast cancer cohort. We looked at three immunohistochemical progesterone receptor assays, in addition to original ligand-binding assay results, in a single retrospective, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort to investigate inter- and intra-observer agreement, concordance, prognostic ability and measures of test performance. All immunohistochemical assays utilized the manufacturer's specified protocols. Five-year disease-free survival was the endpoint of interest, and multivariate models were adjusted for lymph node status, tumor grade, tumor size and human epidermal growth factor 2 status. All assays showed substantial to almost perfect agreement between the three observers (Dako κ=0.69-0.90; Leica κ=0.70-0.89; and Ventana κ=0.78-0.94) and concordance (Dako/Leica κ=0.81; Dako/Ventana κ=0.78; and Leica/Ventana κ=0.82). Univariate survival analyses showed that only the ligand-binding assay, Dako and Ventana assays achieved statistical significance. No statistically significant results were seen in multivariate models, although a strong trend was seen with the Ventana progesterone receptor assay. All assays performed similarly with regards to measures of test performance with ligand-binding assay set as the reference, and all immunohistochemical assays outperformed the ligand-binding assay in regards to 5-year disease-free survival. Despite similar agreement and concordance with the progesterone receptor assays, clear differences were noted with regards to 5-year disease-free survival. Additional survival analyses suggest that clinical utility of estrogen receptor assays vary when investigated in combination with progesterone receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562489     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  39 in total

Review 1.  The total test approach to standardization of immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  C R Taylor
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Time to stop progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Ivo A Olivotto; Pauline T Truong; Caroline H Speers; Vanessa Bernstein; Sharon J Allan; Seamus J Kelly; Mary L Lesperance
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A molecular mechanism of formalin fixation and antigen retrieval.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Kodela Vani; Elizabeth Messana; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Insights into the role of progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne A W Fuqua; Yukun Cui; Adrian V Lee; C Kent Osborne; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Predicting response to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer: a hypothesis.

Authors:  K B Horwitz; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Immunoassay for estrogen receptor does not detect inactivated receptor.

Authors:  L A Molnar; N Dhirani; K Tran; W A McBlain
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  A systematic comparison of three commercial estrogen receptor assays in a single clinical outcome breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Effect of prolonged formalin fixation on the immunohistochemical reactivity of breast markers.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer.

Authors:  Allen M Gown
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improved relapse-free survival on aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer is associated with interaction between oestrogen receptor-α and progesterone receptor-b.

Authors:  Cameron E Snell; Madeline Gough; Cheng Liu; Kathryn Middleton; Christopher Pyke; Catherine Shannon; Natasha Woodward; Theresa E Hickey; Jane E Armes; Wayne D Tilley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Suboptimal concordance in testing and retesting results of triple-negative breast carcinoma cases among laboratories: one institution experience.

Authors:  Jose De Jesus; Marilin Rosa
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 3.  The Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhuo Li; Hongrui Wei; Siyan Li; Pei Wu; Xiaoyun Mao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.