PURPOSE: To investigate nuclear localized and tyrosine phosphorylated Stat5 (Nuc-pYStat5) as a marker of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer and as a predictor of response to antiestrogen therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Levels of Nuc-pYStat5 were analyzed in five archival cohorts of breast cancer by traditional diaminobenzidine-chromogen immunostaining and pathologist scoring of whole tissue sections or by immunofluorescence and automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) of tissue microarrays. RESULTS: Nuc-pYStat5 was an independent prognostic marker as measured by cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with node-negative breast cancer who did not receive systemic adjuvant therapy, when adjusted for common pathology parameters in multivariate analyses both by standard chromogen detection with pathologist scoring of whole tissue sections (cohort I; n = 233) and quantitative immunofluorescence of a tissue microarray (cohort II; n = 291). Two distinct monoclonal antibodies gave concordant results. A progression array (cohort III; n = 180) revealed frequent loss of Nuc-pYStat5 in invasive carcinoma compared to normal breast epithelia or ductal carcinoma in situ, and general loss of Nuc-pYStat5 in lymph node metastases. In cohort IV (n = 221), loss of Nuc-pYStat5 was associated with increased risk of antiestrogen therapy failure as measured by univariate CSS and time to recurrence (TTR). More sensitive AQUA quantification of Nuc-pYStat5 in antiestrogen-treated patients (cohort V; n = 97) identified by multivariate analysis patients with low Nuc-pYStat5 at elevated risk for therapy failure (CSS hazard ratio [HR], 21.55; 95% CI, 5.61 to 82.77; P < .001; TTR HR, 7.30; 95% CI, 2.34 to 22.78; P = .001). CONCLUSION Nuc-pYStat5 is an independent prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer. If confirmed in prospective studies, Nuc-pYStat5 may become a useful predictive marker of response to adjuvant hormone therapy.
PURPOSE: To investigate nuclear localized and tyrosine phosphorylated Stat5 (Nuc-pYStat5) as a marker of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer and as a predictor of response to antiestrogen therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Levels of Nuc-pYStat5 were analyzed in five archival cohorts of breast cancer by traditional diaminobenzidine-chromogen immunostaining and pathologist scoring of whole tissue sections or by immunofluorescence and automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) of tissue microarrays. RESULTS:Nuc-pYStat5 was an independent prognostic marker as measured by cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with node-negative breast cancer who did not receive systemic adjuvant therapy, when adjusted for common pathology parameters in multivariate analyses both by standard chromogen detection with pathologist scoring of whole tissue sections (cohort I; n = 233) and quantitative immunofluorescence of a tissue microarray (cohort II; n = 291). Two distinct monoclonal antibodies gave concordant results. A progression array (cohort III; n = 180) revealed frequent loss of Nuc-pYStat5 in invasive carcinoma compared to normal breast epithelia or ductal carcinoma in situ, and general loss of Nuc-pYStat5 in lymph node metastases. In cohort IV (n = 221), loss of Nuc-pYStat5 was associated with increased risk of antiestrogen therapy failure as measured by univariate CSS and time to recurrence (TTR). More sensitive AQUA quantification of Nuc-pYStat5 in antiestrogen-treated patients (cohort V; n = 97) identified by multivariate analysis patients with low Nuc-pYStat5 at elevated risk for therapy failure (CSS hazard ratio [HR], 21.55; 95% CI, 5.61 to 82.77; P < .001; TTR HR, 7.30; 95% CI, 2.34 to 22.78; P = .001). CONCLUSION Nuc-pYStat5 is an independent prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer. If confirmed in prospective studies, Nuc-pYStat5 may become a useful predictive marker of response to adjuvant hormone therapy.
Authors: Jung Y Kang; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Idris Tolgay Ocal; Baljit Singh; Chen-Yong Lin; Robert B Dickson; David L Rimm; Robert L Camp Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Zhen Lu; Angelica Ortiz; Ioannis I Verginadis; Amy R Peck; Farima Zahedi; Christina Cho; Pengfei Yu; Rachel M DeRita; Hongru Zhang; Ryan Kubanoff; Yunguang Sun; Andrew T Yaspan; Elise Krespan; Daniel P Beiting; Enrico Radaelli; Sandra W Ryeom; J Alan Diehl; Hallgeir Rui; Constantinos Koumenis; Serge Y Fuchs Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Xuanmao Jiao; Marco A Velasco-Velázquez; Min Wang; Zhiping Li; Hallgeir Rui; Amy R Peck; James E Korkola; Xuelian Chen; Shaohua Xu; James B DuHadaway; Sandra Guerrero-Rodriguez; Sankar Addya; Daniela Sicoli; Zhaomei Mu; Gang Zhang; Andres Stucky; Xi Zhang; Massimo Cristofanilli; Alessandro Fatatis; Joe W Gray; Jiang F Zhong; George C Prendergast; Richard G Pestell Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christian Moser; Petra Ruemmele; Sebastian Gehmert; Hedwig Schenk; Marina P Kreutz; Maria E Mycielska; Christina Hackl; Alexander Kroemer; Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Oliver Stoeltzing; Hans J Schlitt; Edward K Geissler; Sven A Lang Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.715