Literature DB >> 20524868

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

M Elizabeth H Hammond1, Daniel F Hayes, Mitch Dowsett, D Craig Allred, Karen L Hagerty, Sunil Badve, Patrick L Fitzgibbons, Glenn Francis, Neil S Goldstein, Malcolm Hayes, David G Hicks, Susan Lester, Richard Love, Pamela B Mangu, Lisa McShane, Keith Miller, C Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Jane Perlmutter, Anthony Rhodes, Hironobu Sasano, Jared N Schwartz, Fred C G Sweep, Sheila Taube, Emina Emilia Torlakovic, Paul Valenstein, Giuseppe Viale, Daniel Visscher, Thomas Wheeler, R Bruce Williams, James L Wittliff, Antonio C Wolff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers.
METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance.
RESULTS: Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524868      PMCID: PMC3073033          DOI: 10.5858/134.6.907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  33 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of immunohistochemistry--issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II.

Authors:  C R Taylor; R M Levenson
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Johnny Raffoul; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Stephen Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A Gusterson; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Recommendations for validating estrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry assays.

Authors:  Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Douglas A Murphy; M Elizabeth H Hammond; D Craig Allred; Paul N Valenstein
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  R M Elledge; S Green; R Pugh; D C Allred; G M Clark; J Hill; P Ravdin; S Martino; C K Osborne
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-03-20       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Immunohistochemical assessment for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer: analysis for a cut-off point as the predictor for endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Yoshinari Ogawa; Takuya Moriya; Yasuyuki Kato; Mitsue Oguma; Katsumi Ikeda; Tsutomua Takashima; Bunzo Nakata; Tetsuro Ishikawa; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.239

8.  Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies.

Authors:  K S McCarty; L S Miller; E B Cox; J Konrath; K S McCarty
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study.

Authors:  Syed K Mohsin; Heidi Weiss; Thomas Havighurst; Gary M Clark; Melora Berardo; Le D Roanh; Ta V To; Zhang Qian; Zho Qian; Richard R Love; D Craig Allred
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Relationship between quantitative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Craig Allred; Jill Knox; Emma Quinn; Janine Salter; Chris Wale; Jack Cuzick; Joan Houghton; Norman Williams; Elizabeth Mallon; Hugh Bishop; Ian Ellis; Denis Larsimont; Hironobu Sasano; Pauline Carder; Antonio Llombart Cussac; Fiona Knox; Valerie Speirs; John Forbes; Aman Buzdar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  185 in total

1.  RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Fay Wang; John Flanagan; Nan Su; Li-Chong Wang; Son Bui; Allissa Nielson; Xingyong Wu; Hong-Thuy Vo; Xiao-Jun Ma; Yuling Luo
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Immunohistochemistry profiles of breast ductal carcinoma: factor analysis of digital image analysis data.

Authors:  Arvydas Laurinavicius; Aida Laurinaviciene; Valerijus Ostapenko; Darius Dasevicius; Sonata Jarmalaite; Juozas Lazutka
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  Immunohistochemical profile and morphology in triple - negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Chandrika Rao; Jayaprakash Shetty; Kishan Hl Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-05-28

4.  Value of pre-treatment biomarkers in prediction of response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Ying; Yingjian He; Meng Qi; Bin Dong; Aiping Lu; Jinfeng Li; Yuntao Xie; Tianfeng Wang; Benyao Lin; Tao Ouyang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  The prognostic significance of BMI1 expression in invasive breast cancer is dependent on its molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Maryam Althobiti; Abir A Muftah; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Chitra Joseph; Michael S Toss; Andrew Green; Emad Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  ERβ expression and breast cancer risk prediction for women with atypias.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Jodi M Carter; John R Hawse; Tanya L Hoskin; Melanie Bois; Marlene Frost; Lynn C Hartmann; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

7.  The variation and clinical significance of hormone receptors and Her-2 status from primary to metastatic lesions in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yan-Yun Zhu; Wen Si; Tie-Feng Ji; Xiao-Qin Guo; Yi Hu; Jun-Lan Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-21

8.  Long-term cultures of stem/progenitor cells from lobular and ductal breast carcinomas under non-adherent conditions.

Authors:  Agostina Nardone; Sara Corvigno; Annalisa Brescia; Daniel D'Andrea; Gennaro Limite; Bianca Maria Veneziani
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Clinicopathological analysis of CD44 and CD24 expression in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Hye Jang; Hyun Jong Kang; Ki Seok Jang; Seung Sam Paik; Wan Seop Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Role of oestrogen receptors in bladder cancer development.

Authors:  Iawen Hsu; Spencer Vitkus; Jun Da; Shuyuan Yeh
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.