Literature DB >> 18810631

Efficient calculation of empirical P-values for genome-wide linkage analysis through weighted permutation.

Sarah E Medland1, James E Schmitt, Bradley T Webb, Po-Hsiu Kuo, Michael C Neale.   

Abstract

Linkage analysis in multivariate or longitudinal context presents both statistical and computational challenges. The permutation test can be used to avoid some of the statistical challenges, but it substantially adds to the computational burden. Utilizing the distributional dependencies between p (defined as the proportion of alleles at a locus that are identical by descent (IBD) for a pairs of relatives, at a given locus) and the permutation test we report a new method of efficient permutation. In summary, the distribution of p for a sample of relatives at locus x is estimated as a weighted mixture of p drawn from a pool of 'representative' p distributions observed at other loci. This weighting scheme is then used to sample from the distribution of the permutation tests at the representative loci to obtain an empirical P-value at locus x (which is asymptotically distributed as the permutation test at loci x). This weighted mixture approach greatly reduces the number of permutation tests required for genome-wide scanning, making it suitable for use in multivariate and other computationally intensive linkage analyses. In addition, because the distribution of p is a property of the genotypic data for a given sample and is independent of the phenotypic data, the weighting scheme can be applied to any phenotype (or combination of phenotypes) collected from that sample. We demonstrate the validity of this approach through simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18810631      PMCID: PMC4010137          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-008-9229-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  23 in total

1.  An empirical test of the significance of an observed quantitative trait locus effect that preserves additive genetic variation.

Authors:  S J Iturria; J T Williams; L Almasy; T D Dyer; J Blangero
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Merlin--rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; Stacey S Cherny; William O Cookson; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Efficient simulation of P values for linkage analysis.

Authors:  Kyunghee K Song; Daniel E Weeks; Eric Sobel; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  The future of association studies: gene-based analysis and replication.

Authors:  Benjamin M Neale; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A genome-wide linkage analysis for the personality trait neuroticism in the Irish affected sib-pair study of alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Po-Hsiu Kuo; Michael C Neale; Brien P Riley; Diana G Patterson; Dermot Walsh; Carol A Prescott; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.568

6.  A multisample bootstrap approach to the estimation of maximized-over-models lod score distributions.

Authors:  J D Terwilliger; J Ott
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1992

7.  A permutation test for the robust sib-pair linkage method.

Authors:  Y Wan; J Cohen; R Guerra
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.

Authors:  G A Churchill; R W Doerge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.

Authors:  C I Amos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Computer-simulation methods in human linkage analysis.

Authors:  J Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomic profiling in CEPH cell lines distinguishes between the camptothecins and indenoisoquinolines.

Authors:  Venita Gresham Watson; Nicholas E Hardison; Tyndall Harris; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 3.  The utility of twins in developmental cognitive neuroscience research: How twins strengthen the ABCD research design.

Authors:  William G Iacono; Andrew C Heath; John K Hewitt; Michael C Neale; Marie T Banich; Monica M Luciana; Pamela A Madden; Deanna M Barch; James M Bjork
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.