Literature DB >> 16898447

Comparison of ghosting effects for three commercial a-Si EPIDs.

L N McDermott1, S M J J G Nijsten, J-J Sonke, M Partridge, M van Herk, B J Mijnheer.   

Abstract

Many studies have reported dosimetric characteristics of amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). Some studies ascribed a non-linear signal to gain ghosting and image lag. Other reports, however, state the effect is negligible. This study compares the signal-to-monitor unit (MU) ratio for three different brands of EPID systems. The signal was measured for a wide range of monitor units (5-1000), dose-rates, and beam energies. All EPIDs exhibited a relative under-response for beams of few MUs; giving 4 to 10% lower signal-to-MU ratios relative to that of 1000 MUs. This under-response is consistent with ghosting effects due to charge trapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16898447     DOI: 10.1118/1.2207318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  A generalized calibration procedure for in vivo transit dosimetry using siemens electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Andrea Fidanzio; Francesca Greco; Laura Gargiulo; Savino Cilla; Domenico Sabatino; Massimo Cappiello; Cinzia Di Felice; Elisabetta Di Castro; Luigi Azario; Mariateresa Russo; Luciano Pompei; Guido D'Onofrio; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Authors:  Song Wang; Joseph K Gardner; John J Gordon; Weidong Li; Luke Clews; Peter B Greer; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Development of an accurate EPID-based output measurement and dosimetric verification tool for electron beam therapy.

Authors:  Aiping Ding; Lei Xing; Bin Han
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dosimetric properties and clinical application of an a-Si EPID for dynamic IMRT quality assurance.

Authors:  Kenji Matsumoto; Masahiko Okumura; Yoshiyuki Asai; Kouhei Shimomura; Masaya Tamura; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-04

6.  The impact of cine EPID image acquisition frame rate on markerless soft-tissue tracking.

Authors:  Stephen Yip; Joerg Rottmann; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  EPID-based dosimetry to verify IMRT planar dose distribution for the aS1200 EPID and FFF beams.

Authors:  Narges Miri; Peter Keller; Benjamin J Zwan; Peter Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Calculation of exit dose for conformal and dynamically-wedged fields, based on water-equivalent path length measured with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Awusi Kavuma; Martin Glegg; Mohamed Metwaly; Garry Currie; Alex Elliott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Normalize the response of EPID in pursuit of linear accelerator dosimetry standardization.

Authors:  Bin Cai; S Murty Goddu; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Douglas Caruthers; Jie Wen; Camille Noel; Sasa Mutic; Baozhou Sun
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  On flattening filter-free portal dosimetry.

Authors:  Eduardo Pardo; Juan Castro Novais; María Yolanda Molina López; Sheila Ruiz Maqueda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.