Literature DB >> 15567533

The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques.

Dheera Ananthakrishnan1, Sigurd Berven, Vedat Deviren, Kevin Cheng, Jeffrey C Lotz, Zheng Xu, Christian M Puttlitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures are a significant cause of morbidity amongst the elderly, resulting in pain, kyphosis, decreased mobility, and often depression. The two most popular operative treatments of compression wedge fractures are vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, however, which method leads to restoration of normal spinal loading is unknown.
METHODS: A cadaveric thoracolumbar spine model was fractured and then treated using one of two techniques: vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Three non-destructive loading regimes were applied to the intact, fractured and treated cases. Sub-adjacent nuclear pressure, used as a measure of anterior column loading, was determined for each experimental variant and loading case.
FINDINGS: The data indicate that nuclear pressure was substantially reduced after the spine was fractured. These pressures were minimally increased after treatment, however, not to the level of the pre-fractured condition. In all loading cases, there were no significant differences between the two treatment types.
INTERPRETATION: While our data show that both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty allow the disc to generate higher nuclear pressures, neither treatment increased nucleus pulposus pressure above the level of the intact state. This directly relates to the clinical condition in that adjacent segment fractures sustained subsequent to either treatment is likely the result of overall disease progression, and not a direct result of the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15567533     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

Authors:  K Bohndorf; R Fessl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  A probabilistic finite element analysis of the stresses in the augmented vertebral body after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Hadi Nabil Boustani; Georg Bergmann; Thomas Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Newly developed compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: comparison with conservative treatment.

Authors:  Keigo Chosa; Akira Naito; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Adjacent level fracture after osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a nonrandomized prospective study comparing balloon kyphoplasty with conservative therapy.

Authors:  Igor Movrin
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.

Authors:  Andreas Boger; Paul Heini; Markus Windolf; Erich Schneider
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20

7.  Incidence and risk factors for early adjacent vertebral fractures after balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic fractures: analysis of the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Emin Aghayev; Rouven Kocher; Christoph Röder; Thomas Forster; Fabrice A Kuelling
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The incidence of new vertebral compression fractures in women after kyphoplasty and factors involved.

Authors:  Eun-Su Moon; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hwan-Mo Lee; Dong-Eun Shin; Jung-Won Ha; Eun-Kyoung Ahn; Dong-Jun Shim; Jun-Young Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture.

Authors:  Michael N Tzermiadianos; Susan M Renner; Frank M Phillips; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Michael R Zindrick; Robert M Havey; Michael Voronov; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Differences in endplate deformation of the adjacent and augmented vertebra following cement augmentation.

Authors:  Paul A Hulme; S K Boyd; P F Heini; S J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.