R Felder-Puig1, B Piso, B Guba, G Gartlehner. 1. Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Garnisong, 7/20, A-1090 Wien, Osterreich. rosemarie.felder@hta.lbg.ac.at
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty using the data presented in recently published papers with respect to pain relief, function, complication rate, and incidence of new vertebral fractures. METHODS: Detailed searches for English-language and German-language articles published between 2002 and 2009 were performed in a number of electronic databases. Because of the large number of case series, we considered only systematic reviews and controlled studies. The internal validity of reviews and studies was judged by two authors independently. Data extraction was performed by one author, and extracted data were checked for completeness and correctness by a second author. RESULTS: A total of eight systematic reviews, primarily summarizing results from case series, and 11 controlled studies, two of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included. Both kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty significantly reduce pain in the majority of patients and can lead to short-term and possibly long-term improvement of function. Kyphoplasty induces fewer clinically relevant complications than vertebroplasty does, and there is presently stronger evidence for its efficacy compared with vertebroplasty. There is inconclusive evidence about the risk of new fractures after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. CONCLUSION: Both procedures seem to be equally effective, but kyphoplasty is safer than vertebroplasty. New results, specifically from RCTs comparing the two procedures, are needed to provide more definitive data.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty using the data presented in recently published papers with respect to pain relief, function, complication rate, and incidence of new vertebral fractures. METHODS: Detailed searches for English-language and German-language articles published between 2002 and 2009 were performed in a number of electronic databases. Because of the large number of case series, we considered only systematic reviews and controlled studies. The internal validity of reviews and studies was judged by two authors independently. Data extraction was performed by one author, and extracted data were checked for completeness and correctness by a second author. RESULTS: A total of eight systematic reviews, primarily summarizing results from case series, and 11 controlled studies, two of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included. Both kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty significantly reduce pain in the majority of patients and can lead to short-term and possibly long-term improvement of function. Kyphoplasty induces fewer clinically relevant complications than vertebroplasty does, and there is presently stronger evidence for its efficacy compared with vertebroplasty. There is inconclusive evidence about the risk of new fractures after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. CONCLUSION: Both procedures seem to be equally effective, but kyphoplasty is safer than vertebroplasty. New results, specifically from RCTs comparing the two procedures, are needed to provide more definitive data.
Authors: Maurits H J Voormolen; Paul N M Lohle; Job R Juttmann; Yolanda van der Graaf; Hendrik Fransen; Leo E H Lampmann Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Christian Kasperk; Jochen Hillmeier; Gerd Nöldge; Ingo A Grafe; Katharina Dafonseca; Dorothea Raupp; Hubert Bardenheuer; Martin Libicher; Ute Monika Liegibel; Ulrike Sommer; Ulrike Hilscher; Walter Pyerin; Marcus Vetter; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Rod S Taylor; Peter Nawroth Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-12-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Ingo A Grafe; Katharina Da Fonseca; Jochen Hillmeier; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Martin Libicher; Gerd Nöldge; Hubert Bardenheuer; Walter Pyerin; Linus Basler; Christel Weiss; Rod S Taylor; Peter Nawroth; Christian Kasperk Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-08-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: F Borgström; D P Beall; S Berven; S Boonen; S Christie; D F Kallmes; J A Kanis; G Olafsson; A J Singer; K Åkesson Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: F Borgström; G Olafsson; O Ström; J B Tillman; D Wardlaw; S Boonen; C Miltenburger Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-04-27 Impact factor: 4.507