Literature DB >> 16896637

[Quantitative ultrasound].

R Barkmann1, C-C Glüer.   

Abstract

Methods of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) can be used to obtain knowledge about bone fragility. Comprehensive study results exist showing the power of QUS for the estimation of osteoporotic fracture risk. Nevertheless, the variety of technologies, devices, and variables as well as different degrees of validation of the single devices have to be taken into account. Using methods to simulate ultrasound propagation, the complex interaction between ultrasound and bone could be understood and the propagation could be visualized. Preceding widespread clinical use, it has to be clarified if patients with low QUS values will profit from therapy, as it has been shown for DXA. Moreover, the introduction of quality assurance measures is essential. The user should know the limitations of the methods and be able to interpret the results correctly. Applied in an adequate manner QUS methods could then, due to lower costs and absence of ionizing radiation, become important players in osteoporosis management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896637     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-006-1394-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  38 in total

1.  Use of multiple acoustic wave modes for assessment of long bones: model study.

Authors:  Alexey Tatarinov; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  F Hartl; A Tyndall; M Kraenzlin; C Bachmeier; C Gückel; U Senn; D Hans; R Theiler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  The elastic anisotropy of bone.

Authors:  J L Katz; A Meunier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Broadband ultrasonic attenuation imaging: a new imaging technique of the os calcis.

Authors:  P Laugier; P Giat; G Berger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?

Authors:  D Hans; S K Srivastav; C Singal; R Barkmann; C F Njeh; E Kantorovich; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Monitoring bone effect of transdermal hormone replacement therapy by ultrasound investigation at the phalanx: a four-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M Mauloni; L C Rovati; R Cadossi; F de Terlizzi; V Ventura; D de Aloysio
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen.

Authors:  C F Njeh; D Hans; C Wu; E Kantorovich; M Sister; T Fuerst; H K Genant
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Does follow-up duration influence the ultrasound and DXA prediction of hip fracture? The EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; F Duboeuf; C Durosier; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Heel ultrasonography in monitoring alendronate therapy: a four-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; A Montagnani; S Martini; L Gennari; M Mangeri; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Elastic properties of osteoporotic bone measured by scanning acoustic microscopy.

Authors:  K Hasegawa; C H Turner; R R Recker; E Wu; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Preventive bone mineral density measurement in postmenopausal women. Differentiation of treatment of recommendations Guidelines of the Umbrella Organization for Osteology ("Dachverband Osteologie")].

Authors:  S Piatek; T Wex; D Adolf; S Klose; S Westphal; H Amthauer; W Halangk; O Jahn; C Riebau; S Winckler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Is bone tissue really affected by swimming? A systematic review.

Authors:  Alejandro Gómez-Bruton; Alejandro Gónzalez-Agüero; Alba Gómez-Cabello; José A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.

Authors:  R Barkmann; S Dencks; P Laugier; F Padilla; K Brixen; J Ryg; A Seekamp; L Mahlke; A Bremer; M Heller; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.507

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.