Literature DB >> 12086353

Heel ultrasonography in monitoring alendronate therapy: a four-year longitudinal study.

S Gonnelli1, C Cepollaro, A Montagnani, S Martini, L Gennari, M Mangeri, C Gennari.   

Abstract

The possibility of using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in monitoring the response to antiresorptive drugs has yet to be defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether heel ultrasonography, considering its characteristics of long-term precision, is able to monitor osteoporotic patients treated with alendronate. We studied 150 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (age 59.6 +/- 5.3 years) treated with alendronate and calcium (n = 74) or with calcium alone (n = 76) for 4 years. At baseline and after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, we measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic 4500), and speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness at the calcaneus by Achilles plus. Moreover, the longitudinal precision of QUS parameters was assessed by measuring 10 subjects once a month for 1 year and, on the basis of the coefficients of variation we obtained, we calculated the Least Significant Change between two measurements. In the alendronate-treated patients, at year 1, BMD increased by 4.2%, SOS by 0.4%, BUA by 1.1% and Stiffness by 3.2%; at year 2, BMD increased by 5.0%, SOS by 0.7%, BUA by 1.4% and Stiffness by 5.7%. At year 3, BMD increased by 6.2%, SOS by 0.9%, BUA by 1.8% and Stiffness by 7.6%. At the end of the study period, BMD increased by 7.6%, SOS by 1.2%, BUA by 1.9% and Stiffness by 9.0%. The minimal significant difference between two measurements was 0.8% for SOS, 5.6% for BUA and 5.0% for Stiffness. Among the QUS parameters, Stiffness showed the greatest total treatment effect and a longitudinal sensitivity which was only slightly lower than BMD. The MTI, which represents the period between scans required to show that a 'true' change has occurred, was 1.8, 2.7, 11.9 and 2.2 years for BMD, SOS, BUA and Stiffness respectively. Therefore, although the spinal BMD remains the optimal method, QUS at the heel, and in particular Stiffness, seems to be a sensitive tool for monitoring the response to alendronate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12086353     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Quantitative ultrasound].

Authors:  R Barkmann; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Judith Adams; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of serum myostatin and sclerostin levels in chronic spinal cord injured patients.

Authors:  M Invernizzi; S Carda; M Rizzi; E Grana; D F Squarzanti; C Cisari; C Molinari; F Renò
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Teriparatide's effects on quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone density in women with established osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; G Martini; C Caffarelli; S Salvadori; A Cadirni; A Montagnani; R Nuti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Genistein effects on quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in osteopenic postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Atteritano; S Mazzaferro; A Frisina; M L Cannata; A Bitto; R D'Anna; F Squadrito; I Macrì; N Frisina; M Buemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in assessment and follow-up of skeletal status in patients after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  D Kovac; J Lindic; A Kandus; F A Bren
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Quantitative ultrasound measurements of bone: measurement error, discordance, and their effects on longitudinal studies.

Authors:  J Zochling; T V Nguyen; L M March; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A comparison of different screening strategies to identify elderly women at high risk of hip fracture: results from the EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  P Dargent-Molina; S Piault; G Bréart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Quantitative heel ultrasonography, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and urine amino-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen in patients with a recent hip fracture.

Authors:  Edward Colt; George Gorich; Stephen Quinnan; Ramona Raj; John Thornton; Brenda Matti; Richard Pierson; Eileen Quinlan
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.