PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients retrospectively underwent ECG-gated 64-slice CT coronary angiography (tube potential 120 kV, tube current time product 650 mAs) after intravenous injection of 80 ml of iodinated contrast agent (320 mg/ml, 5 ml/s). Attenuation values (HU) were measured and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left main artery (LMA). The CNR was defined as the difference between the mean attenuation in the vessel and the mean attenuation in the perivascular fat tissue divided by the image noise in the ascending aorta. The height and weight of the patients at the time of the CT scan were recorded and the BMI was calculated. RESULTS: The mean BMI was 26.2 +/- 3.2 kg/m (2) (range 19.7 - 32.2 kg/m (2)), the mean attenuation in the LMA was 330 +/- 64 HU, and the mean attenuation in the RCA was 309 +/- 68 HU. The CNR in the LMA was 16.7 +/- 3.8, and the CNR in the RCA was 15.9 +/- 3.6. The image noise in the ascending aorta significantly correlated with the BMI (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). A weak negative correlation was found between the BMI and LMA attenuation (r = - 0.28, p < 0.05), whereas no significant correlation was found for the RCA (r = - 0.21, p = 0.12). A significant negative correlation was found between the BMI and the CNR in the RCA (r = - 0.41, p < 0.05) and the LMA (r = - 0.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With constant scan parameters and a constant contrast medium amount, the CNR in both coronary arteries decreases while the BMI increases. This implies a modification of previously standardized and fixed examinations with respect to individually adapted protocols with variable parameters for CT coronary angiography.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients retrospectively underwent ECG-gated 64-slice CT coronary angiography (tube potential 120 kV, tube current time product 650 mAs) after intravenous injection of 80 ml of iodinated contrast agent (320 mg/ml, 5 ml/s). Attenuation values (HU) were measured and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left main artery (LMA). The CNR was defined as the difference between the mean attenuation in the vessel and the mean attenuation in the perivascular fat tissue divided by the image noise in the ascending aorta. The height and weight of the patients at the time of the CT scan were recorded and the BMI was calculated. RESULTS: The mean BMI was 26.2 +/- 3.2 kg/m (2) (range 19.7 - 32.2 kg/m (2)), the mean attenuation in the LMA was 330 +/- 64 HU, and the mean attenuation in the RCA was 309 +/- 68 HU. The CNR in the LMA was 16.7 +/- 3.8, and the CNR in the RCA was 15.9 +/- 3.6. The image noise in the ascending aorta significantly correlated with the BMI (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). A weak negative correlation was found between the BMI and LMA attenuation (r = - 0.28, p < 0.05), whereas no significant correlation was found for the RCA (r = - 0.21, p = 0.12). A significant negative correlation was found between the BMI and the CNR in the RCA (r = - 0.41, p < 0.05) and the LMA (r = - 0.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With constant scan parameters and a constant contrast medium amount, the CNR in both coronary arteries decreases while the BMI increases. This implies a modification of previously standardized and fixed examinations with respect to individually adapted protocols with variable parameters for CT coronary angiography.
Authors: Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Oliver Gaemperli; Christophe A Wyss; Ulf Landmesser; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-04-19 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Aju P Pazhenkottil; Lars Husmann; Ronny R Buechel; Bernhard A Herzog; René Nkoulou; Irene A Burger; Andrea Vetterli; Ines Valenta; Jelena R Ghadri; Patrick von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Marc Dewey; Andrea L Vavere; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Julie M Miller; Leonardo Sara; Christopher Cox; Ilan Gottlieb; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Narinder Paul; John Hoe; Albert de Roos; Albert C Lardo; Joao A Lima; Melvin E Clouse Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Maksymilian P Opolski; Won-Keun Kim; Christoph Liebetrau; Claudia Walther; Johannes Blumenstein; Luise Gaede; Jörg Kempfert; Arnaud Van Linden; Thomas Walther; Christian W Hamm; Helge Möllmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Harald Seifarth; Michael Puesken; John F Kalafut; Susanne Wienbeck; Johannes Wessling; David Maintz; Walter Heindel; Kai-Uwe Juergens Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Paul Poirier; Lora E Burke; Jean-Pierre Després; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Carl J Lavie; Scott A Lear; Chiadi E Ndumele; Ian J Neeland; Prashanthan Sanders; Marie-Pierre St-Onge Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hong Seon Lee; Young Joo Suh; Kyunghwa Han; Jin Young Kim; Suyon Chang; Dong Jin Im; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Jin Hur; Young Jin Kim; Byoung Wook Choi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 3.240