Literature DB >> 26739258

The time course of cognitive control implementation.

Clio Janssens1, Esther De Loof2, Gilles Pourtois3, Tom Verguts2.   

Abstract

Optimally recruiting cognitive control is a key factor in efficient task performance. In line with influential cognitive control theories, earlier work assumed that control is relatively slow. We challenge this notion and test whether control also can be implemented more rapidly by investigating the time course of cognitive control. In two experiments, a visual discrimination paradigm was applied. A reward cue was presented with variable intervals to target onset. The results showed that reward cues can rapidly improve performance. Importantly, the reward manipulation was orthogonal to the response, ensuring that the reward effect was due to fast cognitive control implementation rather than to automatic activation of rewarded S-R associations. We also empirically specify the temporal limits of cognitive control, because the reward cue had no effect when it was presented shortly after target onset, during task execution.

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Reward; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26739258     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0992-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing.

Authors:  M F Damian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Rico Fischer; Maja Dshemuchadse; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: location as a contextual cue.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; Zhiyu Gong; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

Review 5.  Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism.

Authors:  Matthew Botvinick; Todd Braver
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Motivational influences on response inhibition measures.

Authors:  Lauren A Leotti; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-22

8.  Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation.

Authors:  Hanne Schevernels; Ruth M Krebs; Patrick Santens; Marty G Woldorff; C Nicolas Boehler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Overlapping neural systems represent cognitive effort and reward anticipation.

Authors:  Eliana Vassena; Massimo Silvetti; Carsten N Boehler; Eric Achten; Wim Fias; Tom Verguts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Adaptive effort investment in cognitive and physical tasks: a neurocomputational model.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Eliana Vassena; Massimo Silvetti
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account.

Authors:  Sam Verschooren; Sebastian Schindler; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

2.  Task-specific prioritization of reward and effort information: Novel insights from behavior and computational modeling.

Authors:  Eliana Vassena; James Deraeve; William H Alexander
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming.

Authors:  Joyse Medeiros; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.